The chart below shows how frequently people in the USA ate in fast food restaurants between 2003 and 2013.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The bar chart compares the rate of eating fast food of people in the USA from 2003 to 2013.
It is clear that the people ate fast food once a week and once or twice a month a month rates were highest figure shown on the chart. We can also see that the figures for both people who ate every day and never were roughly equal.
In year 2003, 2006 and 2013, the percentage of people who ate fast food once a week stood at 31%, 33% and 28% respectively, while the figure of people who ate once or twice a month reached at 30%, 25% and 33% respectively. This was trends of people in the USA shown on the chart.
Over the period, the rate of people who ate in fast food restaurants every day and never remained below 5%. The people rates ate several times a week in 2003 and 2006 were higher 5% than the figure for eaters ate a few times a year. In contrast, the proportion of eaters who ate several times a week and a few times a year were same at 16%.
- You should spend about 20 minutes on this task.The diagram below shows how tomato ketchup is made.Write at least 150 words. 56
- The chart below shows the total number of minutes (in billions) of telephone calls in the UK, divides into three categories, from 1995-2002.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 78
- The charts below give information on the ages of the population of Yemen and Italy in 2000 and projections for 2050.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 56
- It is more important to learn about local history than foreign history. To what extent do you agree or disagree?Wrire at least 250 words. 61
- The chart below shows the total number of minutes (in billions) of telephone calls in the UK, divides into three categories, from 1995-2002.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 73, Rule ID: PHRASE_REPETITION[1]
Message: This phrase is duplicated. You should probably leave only 'a month'.
Suggestion: a month
...fast food once a week and once or twice a month a month rates were highest figure shown on the ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 95, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'were the highest'.
Suggestion: were the highest
...and once or twice a month a month rates were highest figure shown on the chart. We can also ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, so, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 22.0 33.7804878049 65% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 767.0 965.302439024 79% => OK
No of words: 189.0 196.424390244 96% => OK
Chars per words: 4.0582010582 4.92477711251 82% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.70779275107 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.00131532012 2.65546596893 75% => OK
Unique words: 85.0 106.607317073 80% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.449735449735 0.547539520022 82% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 234.9 283.868780488 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.2 1.45097560976 83% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.2327315116 43.030603864 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.875 112.824112599 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.625 22.9334400587 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.5 5.23603664747 67% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.231837733419 0.215688989381 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.130903346213 0.103423049105 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0719904386562 0.0843802449381 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.17735973714 0.15604864568 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0561968324296 0.0819641961636 69% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.5 13.2329268293 72% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 81.97 61.2550243902 134% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.5 10.3012195122 73% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 6.56 11.4140731707 57% => Coleman_liau_index is low.
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.53 8.06136585366 81% => OK
difficult_words: 21.0 40.7170731707 52% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 7.0 11.0658536585 63% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.