Task 2: Some people think that people should be given the right to use fresh water as they like. Others believe governments should strictly control the use of fresh water. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
Fresh water sources are becoming scarer and scarer. A number of people say that this valuable resource should be left for politicians to be well-controlled and regulated. In contrast, some say it is citizen’s rights to have complete access. This following essay will discuss both aspects of the situation.
Making fresh water fully accessible for people might have more negative impacts on their livelihood later on. Firstly, this will make the water vulnerable to contaminants since local could easily discard many types of wastes coming from their daily activities directly into the water. A visible example for this is the sight of Sai Gon river in Ho Chi Minh City, because of authorities’ neglection, locals who reside on the banks now discharging the river with their sewage and garbage in bunk daily. Secondly, drinkers will not be able to tell the quality of the water they are consuming into their body. Without any expert confirmations on the safety of water sources, contaminated water will be drunken by people in a large-scale, hence spreading several kinds of dangerous diseases. For instance, a small village in India has registered an outbreak of an illness which started with a type of bacteria living in their regular water dispenser.
Given human recourses and legal influence, governments could tackle these mentioned problems with ease. First of all, environmental bills can be passed and implemented to prevent the water from being polluted and strictly punish violating cases. This will prohibit any actions that maybe harmful to water sources. Such as in many cities in Europe, any actions of causing pollution, especially water pollution are harshly banned from society. In addition, health care experts might be sent to every area to evaluate the water source of dwellers.
In conclusion, endangered precious resources like water should be handled by entitled figures for the reason that they have more profound knowledge and power compared to the masses.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-03-23 | Mollymaul | 84 | view |
| 2023-02-26 | TLan168 | 89 | view |
| 2022-09-19 | Charles Le | 84 | view |
| 2022-08-05 | Trần Ánh Vy | 78 | view |
| 2022-03-01 | oanhnth | 73 | view |
- Some people think that young people should be required to do unpaid work helping people in the community Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 56
- The diagram below shows the multistage production of pears as canned fruits Write a report for a university lecturer describing the process below 78
- Some people think the government funding should not be used for supporting art and culture while others think supporting cultural activities may be beneficial for the population and the culture Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 61
- In many countries children are becoming overweight and unhealthy Some people think that government should have the responsibility To what extend do you agree or disagree 56
- Today s society provides people with various ways to lose weight such as special diets or exercise regimes Many people believe though that poor food and today s lifestyle should be addressed first What is your viewpoint of this situation 56
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, hence, may, second, secondly, so, well, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, in contrast, such as, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 41.998997996 117% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1673.0 1615.20841683 104% => OK
No of words: 318.0 315.596192385 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.26100628931 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22286093782 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71573062592 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 204.0 176.041082164 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.641509433962 0.561755894193 114% => OK
syllable_count: 522.0 506.74238477 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.1320866687 49.4020404114 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.5625 106.682146367 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.875 20.7667163134 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.25 7.06120827912 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.262860552824 0.244688304435 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0840741174231 0.084324248473 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0444474322986 0.0667982634062 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.16170984198 0.151304729494 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0377729043771 0.056905535591 66% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.23 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.09 8.58950901804 117% => OK
difficult_words: 111.0 78.4519038076 141% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.