The chart below shows the number of households in the US by their annual
income in 2007, 2011 and 2015.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and
make comparisons where relevant.
The chart illustrates the number of households in the United States based on their annual income in three different years: 2007, 2011, and 2015.
Overall, the chart shows an slight increase in the number of households across all income categories from 2007 to 2015. In 2007, the largest group of households fell into the $100,000 or more income bracket, followed closely by the $25,000-$49,999 and less than $25,000 bracket. By 2011, the $25,000-$49,999 bracket become the largest, there WAS also a significant increase in the number of households with incomes less than $25,000 per year and the $100,000 or more bracket slight decrease. And in 2015, there was a small dip in the number of households with less than $49,999 brackets, likely due to the economic recession.
The lowest income bracket of under $25,000 suffered the least significant changes, while the highest income bracket of $100,000 or more had the most significant changes.
In 2015, all income brackets had exceeded their of 2007 levels. Overall, the chart demonstrates a gradual increase in the number of households across all income categories over the three years observed. However, there was also a significant increase of number of household in 2015 compared to 2007.
- The maps below show an industrial area in the town of Norbiton and planned future development of the site Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- The chart below gives information about how families in one country spent their weekly income in 1968 and in 2018 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- Nowadays a growing number of people with health problems are trying alternative medicines and treatments instead of visiting the usual doctor Do you think this is a positive or negative development 56
- Some people believe that professionals such as doctors and engineers should be required to work in the country where they did their training Others believe they should be free to work in another country if they wish Discuss both these views and give your 67
- Some children spend hours every day on their smartphones Why is this the case Do you think this is a positive or a negative development Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your ow 56
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 26, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...11, and 2015. Overall, the chart shows an slight increase in the number of househ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1035.0 965.302439024 107% => OK
No of words: 201.0 196.424390244 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.14925373134 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76529505866 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58515045906 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 93.0 106.607317073 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.462686567164 0.547539520022 85% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 282.6 283.868780488 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.0467548623 43.030603864 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.0 112.824112599 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.3333333333 22.9334400587 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.11111111111 5.23603664747 59% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.245004074335 0.215688989381 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.144219831096 0.103423049105 139% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0851131188826 0.0843802449381 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.188989730191 0.15604864568 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.101764751496 0.0819641961636 124% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.2329268293 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.89 11.4140731707 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.4 8.06136585366 92% => OK
difficult_words: 34.0 40.7170731707 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 26, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...11, and 2015. Overall, the chart shows an slight increase in the number of househ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1035.0 965.302439024 107% => OK
No of words: 201.0 196.424390244 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.14925373134 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76529505866 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58515045906 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 93.0 106.607317073 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.462686567164 0.547539520022 85% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 282.6 283.868780488 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.0467548623 43.030603864 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.0 112.824112599 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.3333333333 22.9334400587 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.11111111111 5.23603664747 59% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.245004074335 0.215688989381 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.144219831096 0.103423049105 139% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0851131188826 0.0843802449381 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.188989730191 0.15604864568 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.101764751496 0.0819641961636 124% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.2329268293 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.89 11.4140731707 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.4 8.06136585366 92% => OK
difficult_words: 34.0 40.7170731707 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.