The chart below shows the number of men and women in further education in
Britain in three periods and whether they were studying fulltime or part-time.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and
make comparisons where relevant.
The chart indicates the number of males and females taking part in both fulltime and part-time education during year 1970-71, 1980-81 and 1990-91 in Britain. The Unit of measurement is thousands in further education.
Overall, the people undergoing fulltime education was significantly higher compared to part-time education in Britain. The highest participation in the education was observed in 1990-91 (fulltime) and lowest in 1970-71 (part-time), both in women category.
The men participated in fulltime education was highest in 1970-71 and lowest in 1980-81 (1000 and around 850 thousands respectively) which was followed by around 900 units in 1990-91. But number of women who participated in fulltime increased considerably during years 1970-71, 1980-81 and 1990-91 with around 650, 800 and 1100 thousands respectively.
The men taking part-time education increased in the three years duration (around 100, 120 and 200 in 1970-71, 1980-81 and 1990-91 respectively). Similarly the women taking part part-time was around 90, 190 and 200 thousands in 1970-71, 1980-81 and 1990-91 respectively.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-08-23 | BangLangTim | 73 | view |
| 2019-08-20 | sashwini50 | 67 | view |
| 2019-07-03 | MJ Yand | 73 | view |
- The table below shows information and predictions regarding the change in percentage of the population aged 65 and above in three conditions 73
- The diagram below shows the stages and equipment used in the cement-making process, and how comment is used to produce concrete for building purposes 78
- The chart below gives information on the percentage of British people giving money to charity by age range for the years 1990 and 2010.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant. 56
- The chart below shows the number of men and women in further education inBritain in three periods and whether they were studying fulltime or part-time.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, andmake comparisons where releva 67
- The internet allows us to stay connected with each other no matter where we are. On the other hand, it also isolates us and encourages people not to socialize.To what extent do you agree or disagree with these statements?Give reasons for your answer and i 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 144, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Similarly,
...0-71, 1980-81 and 1990-91 respectively. Similarly the women taking part part-time was aro...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, similarly
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 6.8 191% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 0.0 5.60731707317 0% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 3.97073170732 252% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 932.0 965.302439024 97% => OK
No of words: 163.0 196.424390244 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.71779141104 4.92477711251 116% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.57311423478 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.98884472977 2.65546596893 113% => OK
Unique words: 73.0 106.607317073 68% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.447852760736 0.547539520022 82% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 244.8 283.868780488 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 0.0 3.36585365854 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.3922219562 43.030603864 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.5 112.824112599 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.375 22.9334400587 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.25 5.23603664747 43% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.166321397525 0.215688989381 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.103338360045 0.103423049105 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0417510050322 0.0843802449381 49% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.134693559416 0.15604864568 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0421305882663 0.0819641961636 51% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.7 13.2329268293 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 61.2550243902 97% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.9 11.4140731707 139% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.63 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 31.0 40.7170731707 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 11.4329268293 109% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.