You should spend about 20 minutes on this task.The chart below shows the number of men and women in further education inBritain in three periods and whether they were studying fulltime or part-time.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the

Essay topics:

You should spend about 20 minutes on this task.
The chart below shows the number of men and women in further education in
Britain in three periods and whether they were studying fulltime or part-time.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and
make comparisons where relevant.
Write at least 150 words.

The graph illustrates the number of male and female in higher education in England between 1970 and 1990, and when they were studying having a job either a full-time job or part-time job.

Roughly speaking about part-time education, women were gradually increased during the periods from under 700 thousands, around 800 thousands and 1000 thousands, a rise of about 400 thousands, in those periods. On the other hand, men were the peak in 1970, 1000 thousands then, went down to around 800 thousands, and lastly increased just under 900 thousands.

Relatively, those who employed as full-time education were lower than part-time education but the interesting point is that both genders had risen. There was the biggest movement in female education from 1970 to 1980, an increment about twice, but male education seemed a gradual change.

Comparing with full-time and part-time, part-time is completely great importance of male and female. On the contrary, full-time job is mostly under 200 thousands of students on both gender in the periods.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2019-08-23 BangLangTim 73 view
2019-08-20 sashwini50 67 view
2019-07-03 MJ Yand 73 view
2018-01-11 Esraa Emam 56 view
2018-01-10 Esraa Emam 56 view
Essays by user MJ Yand :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 149, Rule ID: CD_DOZENS_OF[1]
Message: Use a singular form of the numeral here: '200 thousand'.
Suggestion: 200 thousand
...contrary, full-time job is mostly under 200 thousands of students on both gender in the periods....
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, lastly, then, speaking about, on the contrary, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 33.7804878049 83% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 3.97073170732 227% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 885.0 965.302439024 92% => OK
No of words: 167.0 196.424390244 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.2994011976 4.92477711251 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.59483629437 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67316817733 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 100.0 106.607317073 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.59880239521 0.547539520022 109% => OK
syllable_count: 252.9 283.868780488 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.1324161149 43.030603864 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.428571429 112.824112599 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.8571428571 22.9334400587 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.85714285714 5.23603664747 188% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.194250437392 0.215688989381 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0940843004487 0.103423049105 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.044630922075 0.0843802449381 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.12103509734 0.15604864568 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.022095051533 0.0819641961636 27% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 13.2329268293 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 61.2550243902 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.76 11.4140731707 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.28 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.