The chart below shows the number of travellers using three major airports in New York City between 1995 and 2000.
The bar chart depicts that commuters use three different airport in New York city for traveling between 1955 and 2000.
Overall, LaGuardia had the highest number of visitor at airport in 2000. While, the trend for number of travellers at John F. Kennedy fluctuated slightly throughout the period.
As the graph shows, According to LaGuardia airport, the number of dwellers who used the airport for traveling accounted, at 35 million in 1955 and the figure increased steadily throughout the period and ended up with 69 million passengers, the highest figure among three airport. Secondly, New York had the lowest number of passengers in 1955 at 15 million but then it experienced a rise till 1998 with 27 million commuters afterwards it reminded constant during the two years of period from 1998 to 2000.
In terms of John F. Kennedy, the figure for passengers started with 25 million in 1995. After witnessing a rise to 47 million in 1997, the usage of airport among travellers decreased by 15% until 1999. But in the last, it ended up 43 million people use the airport in John F. Kennedy in 2000 that was slight higher than Newark.
- The Table below shows the results of a survey that asked 6800 Scottish adults (aged 16 years and over) whether they had taken part in different cultural activities in the past 12 months. 73
- The diagram shows how electricity is generated by a hydroelectric dam. 73
- The line graph below shows the percentage of tourists to England who visited four different attractions in Brighton. 78
- Life was better when technology was simpler. To what extent do you agree and disagree? 73
- Some people believe government should spend money on building train and subway lines to reduce traffic congestion. Others think that building more and wider roads is the better way to reduce traffic congestion. Discuss both views and give your opinion. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 58, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'airport' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'airports'.
Suggestion: airports
...icts that commuters use three different airport in New York city for traveling between ...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 272, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'airport' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'airports'.
Suggestion: airports
...sengers, the highest figure among three airport. Secondly, New York had the lowest numb...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, second, secondly, then, well, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 1.0 7.0 14% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 33.7804878049 118% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 948.0 965.302439024 98% => OK
No of words: 194.0 196.424390244 99% => OK
Chars per words: 4.88659793814 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.73207559907 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.53434271061 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Unique words: 105.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.541237113402 0.547539520022 99% => OK
syllable_count: 256.5 283.868780488 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 76.5709307637 43.030603864 178% => OK
Chars per sentence: 86.1818181818 112.824112599 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.6363636364 22.9334400587 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.0 5.23603664747 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.313222305938 0.215688989381 145% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.115786601007 0.103423049105 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.125911353246 0.0843802449381 149% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.234267479498 0.15604864568 150% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.1431483555 0.0819641961636 175% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.4 13.2329268293 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 79.6 61.2550243902 130% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.4 10.3012195122 62% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.79 11.4140731707 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.49 8.06136585366 93% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.