Some people think that it is more beneficial to take part in sports which are played in teams, like football. But others think taking part in individual sports is better, like swimming. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
There has been a colossal upsurge in discussing whether people should partake in team sports or individual sports. Although each of these are selected based on players's opinion, both types of sports are astonishing beneficial to our mental and physical health. Two sides of this debate will be analysed in this essay before my rational conclusion is reached.
First and foremost, playing sports in a team can teach us how to collaborate or cooperate well with other people. It is hardly unaccepted joining and working in a group can help us know the meaning and power of a team spirit. Secondly, partaking in a team can make us recognize that winning is not everything and we know how to share with each others. Thirdly, once paticipating in a team sports, we can observe and imitate the tactics of other players. This can save time and money for us instead of searching a teacher or many webites to know the strategies and rules of sports. Finally, taking part in a team can force us play effectively in sport and it is interesting, joinful when we get partners to do sport together.
However, some people may have a tendency for joing in individuals sport. To be clear, the first reason some from the players's characteristic, they are introvert and they do feel good when doing sport by themselves. Moreover, some sports don't require us to establish a team such as swimming, cycling, strolling, etc so it is difficult for us to have a team in these games. Furthermore, working in a team sometimes cause a conflict and exist unfair problems for each member. The superior member may receive a range of compliments whereas the inferior player is criticized by viewers. Taking for an instance, in a football contest, coach and spectaculars only pay attention to a leader or excellent members and neglect to the others. This may create an envy among these members in a group and inequivalent phenomenon in one team.
In conclusion, it is evident that the value of sports is support players to mitigate the sedentary lifestyle and keep our body limber and supple. While any sports will bring tremendous advantage to our live, I personally give a green light for partaking in a team sports due to its value, meaning.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-07-14 | horae.zh | 61 | view |
| 2023-04-06 | hieu13092006 | 73 | view |
| 2022-08-19 | Nguyễn Ninh | 56 | view |
| 2022-08-16 | dorae | 78 | view |
| 2022-05-26 | quytnee | 78 | view |
- The maps below show an industrial area in the town Norbiton and planned future development of the site 82
- The chart shows the unemployment situation in Australia in the year 2012 73
- The pie graphs show the nutritional consistency of the two dinners 73
- The line graph below shows the oil production and consumption in China between 1982 and 2006 67
- The chart below shows global sales of the top five mobile phone brands between 2009 and 2013 73
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 238, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...rt by themselves. Moreover, some sports dont require us to establish a team such as ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, furthermore, however, if, may, moreover, second, secondly, so, third, thirdly, well, whereas, while, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 20.0 10.4138276553 192% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 32.0 24.0651302605 133% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1839.0 1615.20841683 114% => OK
No of words: 382.0 315.596192385 121% => OK
Chars per words: 4.81413612565 5.12529762239 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.42095241839 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75764808386 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 217.0 176.041082164 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.568062827225 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 567.9 506.74238477 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 23.3304892447 49.4020404114 47% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 102.166666667 106.682146367 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.2222222222 20.7667163134 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.72222222222 7.06120827912 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.226359894052 0.244688304435 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0706499990325 0.084324248473 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0616429253093 0.0667982634062 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.130904020354 0.151304729494 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0144433242341 0.056905535591 25% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 13.0946893788 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 50.2224549098 117% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.62 12.4159519038 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.77 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 78.4519038076 126% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 238, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...rt by themselves. Moreover, some sports dont require us to establish a team such as ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, furthermore, however, if, may, moreover, second, secondly, so, third, thirdly, well, whereas, while, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 20.0 10.4138276553 192% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 32.0 24.0651302605 133% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1839.0 1615.20841683 114% => OK
No of words: 382.0 315.596192385 121% => OK
Chars per words: 4.81413612565 5.12529762239 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.42095241839 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75764808386 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 217.0 176.041082164 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.568062827225 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 567.9 506.74238477 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 23.3304892447 49.4020404114 47% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 102.166666667 106.682146367 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.2222222222 20.7667163134 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.72222222222 7.06120827912 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.226359894052 0.244688304435 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0706499990325 0.084324248473 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0616429253093 0.0667982634062 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.130904020354 0.151304729494 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0144433242341 0.056905535591 25% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 13.0946893788 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 50.2224549098 117% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.62 12.4159519038 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.77 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 78.4519038076 126% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.