The chart below shows the number of trips made by children in one country in 1990 and 2010 to travel to and from school using different modes of transport.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
This bar graph indicates the number of primary school students, in a range of 5-12 ages, that choose 5 different methods to go and back from their school at 1990 and 2010. Generally, it can be said that in 1990, there were a lot of students that preferred walking to make a move to and from their school, however in 21 century, it change, which more children choose car as their main vehicle.
At the beginning in 1990, there were more than 12 millions students that walk to and back from that institution. It is interesting to note that over 6 million of students use bicycle and bus as a medium of transportation, but almost 6 million of them preferred walk and take a bus. The least famous method was using a car to travel to their school where only 4.5 million of students approximately choose this.
In the next 20 years, there were a slight difference in the pattern. Surprisingly, the students that choose to be a passeger to the car marked the highest number, around 11 millions. There were 6 millions of children walk to the school. Turning to the less preferred ways to move to and back from school, taking a bus, walking and used the bus and cycling (5 millions, 3 millions and 2 millions students respectively).
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2023-08-26 | HASAN.511 | view | |
2023-05-08 | vuhungbo | 73 | view |
2023-05-08 | vuhungbo | 79 | view |
2023-03-15 | Areeb Rooman | 73 | view |
2022-11-18 | khanhkhanhkhanhkhanhkhanh | view |
- The chart below shows the number of trips made by children in one country in 1990 and 2010 to travel to and from school using different modes of transport.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where r 73
- Many old buildings protected by law are part of a nations’s history. Some people think they should be knocked down and replaced by new ones.How important is it to maintain old buildings? 66
- xx 11
- Did you agree that children should stay at home and study through online instead of go to school? 73
- The chart below shows the number of trips made by children in one country in 1990 and 2010 to travel to and from school using different modes of transport.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where r 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 320, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'century' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'centuries'.
Suggestion: centuries
...to and from their school, however in 21 century, it change, which more children choose ...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 332, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'changes'?
Suggestion: changes
...their school, however in 21 century, it change, which more children choose car as thei...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...en choose car as their main vehicle. At the beginning in 1990, there were mor...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...students approximately choose this. In the next 20 years, there were a sligh...
^^^^
Line 5, column 198, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...t number, around 11 millions. There were 6 millions of children walk to the schoo...
^^
Line 5, column 200, Rule ID: CD_DOZENS_OF[1]
Message: Use a singular form of the numeral here: '6 million'.
Suggestion: 6 million
...number, around 11 millions. There were 6 millions of children walk to the school. Turning to...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 6.8 162% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 3.15609756098 285% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 17.0 5.60731707317 303% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1009.0 965.302439024 105% => OK
No of words: 221.0 196.424390244 113% => OK
Chars per words: 4.56561085973 4.92477711251 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.85565412703 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65612786845 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 114.0 106.607317073 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.515837104072 0.547539520022 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 287.1 283.868780488 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 1.53170731707 326% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.2856921784 43.030603864 119% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.111111111 112.824112599 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.5555555556 22.9334400587 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.77777777778 5.23603664747 34% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 6.0 1.69756097561 353% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.163643300079 0.215688989381 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0781545748664 0.103423049105 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0450507156249 0.0843802449381 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.123715263391 0.15604864568 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0439642019569 0.0819641961636 54% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.2329268293 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 72.5 61.2550243902 118% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.52 11.4140731707 83% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.04 8.06136585366 87% => OK
difficult_words: 31.0 40.7170731707 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.