The given chart compares the difference between the numbers of accidents and injuries per 100 million traveller miles by bus and 3 types of rail in 2002.
Overall, the major reason associated with the high rate of incidents as well as injuries is response demand. Meanwhile, travelling by commuter rail seemed to be the safest way with the lowest accidents and trauma rate.
At the first glance, commuting by rail and bus could guarantee the passengers' security as it always was the minor attributor to unfortunate accidents and injuries. In 2002, there were lower than 25 incidents of rail's commuters, the figure for heavy rail, light rail and bus were 50, 75, and 75 respectively with fewer injured (about 30, 30 and 60 respectively).
On the contrary, travellers who answered demands while driving caused more than 250 accidents in 2002, threefold than the number of light rail and bus, fourfold and fivefold higher than heavy rail and commuter rail. Similarly, these accidents caused more than 160 injuries, almost two to three times higher than other factors.
- The chart and table below give information about population figures in Japan Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 56
- Rich countries often give money to poorer countries but it does not solve poverty Therefore developed countries should give other types of help to the poor countries rather than financial aid To what extent do you agree or disagree Give reasons for your a 84
- The table below shows the sales at a small restaurant in a downtown business distrcit 73
- Write about the following topic Computers are often argued to be the most important invention of the last hundred years To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your o 84
- The graph below shows information on employment rates across 6 countries in 1995 and 2005 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 68, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'passengers'' or 'passenger's'?
Suggestion: passengers'; passenger's
...ing by rail and bus could guarantee the passengers security as it always was the minor att...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 94, Rule ID: ADVERB_WORD_ORDER[5]
Message: The adverb 'always' is usually put after the verb 'was'.
Suggestion: was always
...guarantee the passengers security as it always was the minor attributor to unfortunate acc...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, similarly, so, well, while, as well as, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 6.8 162% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 21.0 33.7804878049 62% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 890.0 965.302439024 92% => OK
No of words: 176.0 196.424390244 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.05681818182 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.64232057368 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58921395903 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 114.0 106.607317073 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.647727272727 0.547539520022 118% => OK
syllable_count: 261.0 283.868780488 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.4822964582 43.030603864 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.142857143 112.824112599 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.1428571429 22.9334400587 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.1428571429 5.23603664747 194% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 1.13902439024 527% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.124415480832 0.215688989381 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0734448494667 0.103423049105 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.101281740598 0.0843802449381 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.112462952898 0.15604864568 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.118771603669 0.0819641961636 145% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 13.2329268293 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 61.2550243902 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.3012195122 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.36 11.4140731707 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.09 8.06136585366 113% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 40.7170731707 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.