The chart below depicts the proportion of earnings variation between the ladies and gents for a period of 40 years.
Broadly, the gap is the maximum in Japan and the least in France. With both the countries showing a favourable trend for women as there is a narrowing trend that is noted.
While the difference between the earnings is at the rate of fifty percent in Japan in 1978, this fell down to forty percent in 2008. An excellent example of the snail like progress in the concept of equal pay. Even developed and powerful economies like US and UK have failed to plug this inequality. Yet, there has been little improvement.The disparity has fallen from approximately thirty percent by around five percent.
Oddly enough, France with all its quirks has consistently been the torch bearer of equal pay, the difference in wage rates was merely twenty percent in the seventies and it has fallen to be roughly fifteen percent. Though, there is some progress and a considerably slow pace, the real cause for concern is Australia. This country that was historically inclined towards minimal income gap between the sexes, has since an upward movement favoring unequal pay from 1998 to 2008.What was initially lesser than twenty percent is now rising to thirty percent, indicating a worsening workplace for women.
- The diagrams below show the life cycle of the silkworm and the stages in the production of silk cloth. 56
- The chart below shows the process of waste paper recycling. 78
- The chart below shows the percentage of difference in income between men and women from 1978 to 2008 78
- The diagram shows the life cycle of the silkworm and stages in the production of the Silk Cloth. 56
- the table shows how many people used different form public transport in million between 2010 and 2014. 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 340, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: The
... Yet, there has been little improvement.The disparity has fallen from approximatel...
^^^
Line 5, column 353, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...as been little improvement.The disparity has fallen from approximately thirty per...
^^
Line 7, column 476, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: What
... favoring unequal pay from 1998 to 2008.What was initially lesser than twenty percen...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 7.0 186% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1100.0 965.302439024 114% => OK
No of words: 220.0 196.424390244 112% => OK
Chars per words: 5.0 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.85128510684 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61928638316 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 137.0 106.607317073 129% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.622727272727 0.547539520022 114% => OK
syllable_count: 333.9 283.868780488 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 63.353689711 43.030603864 147% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.0 112.824112599 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0 22.9334400587 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.3 5.23603664747 25% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.185425726182 0.215688989381 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.058420813562 0.103423049105 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0615410867635 0.0843802449381 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.103892311888 0.15604864568 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0233944393806 0.0819641961636 29% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.2329268293 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 61.2550243902 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.72 11.4140731707 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.6 8.06136585366 107% => OK
difficult_words: 54.0 40.7170731707 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.