The chart below shows the percentage of households in owned and rented accomodation in England and Wales between 1918 and 2011.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

Essay topics:

The chart below shows the percentage of households in owned and rented accomodation in England and Wales between 1918 and 2011.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

A glance at the bar chart provided reveals a comparision between two categories of households accommodation, owning and renting, in England and Wales from the year 1918 to the year 2011. Overall, households owning accommodation decreased over the time period. In contrast, the households renting accommodation increased.

In 1918, the percentage of households in owned accommodation were almost 70% while the percentage of households in rentend accommodation were around 20% in the same year, which shows a relevant difference between them in the begin of the period given. However, the percentage of households in rentend accommodation slightly increase until 2001, when the percentage was around 80%. In comparasion, the percentage of households in owned accommodation went down over the same time period, with a percentage of 30% in 2001.

In the last ten years, between 2001 and 2011, it is possible to see a small drop in the percentage of households in rentend accommodation and a small grow in the percentage of households in owned accommodation - from almost 70% to around 65% and from 30% to around 35%, respectively.

Votes
Average: 6.7 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2019-08-18 arpu 78 view
2019-08-07 carloseefeusp 67 view
Essays by user carloseefeusp :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 222, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...s a relevant difference between them in the begin of the period given. However, the perce...
^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, while, in contrast

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 33.7804878049 133% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 3.97073170732 252% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 953.0 965.302439024 99% => OK
No of words: 179.0 196.424390244 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.32402234637 4.92477711251 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.65774358864 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.28950350864 2.65546596893 124% => OK
Unique words: 86.0 106.607317073 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.480446927374 0.547539520022 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 282.6 283.868780488 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 78.6832969854 43.030603864 183% => OK
Chars per sentence: 136.142857143 112.824112599 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.5714285714 22.9334400587 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.42857142857 5.23603664747 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.238202114339 0.215688989381 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.129064637093 0.103423049105 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0431599540298 0.0843802449381 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.179377523866 0.15604864568 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0431486571252 0.0819641961636 53% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.4 13.2329268293 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 61.2550243902 75% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 10.3012195122 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.87 11.4140731707 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.43 8.06136585366 92% => OK
difficult_words: 29.0 40.7170731707 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.