The two maps below show road access to a city hospital in 2007 and in 2010.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
A glance to the two maps provided shows us the City Hospital in two different years, which allow us to make some relevant comparasions. The main purpouse of this comparasion is to point out the changes in the city from 2007 to 2010. Overall, the main changes are the two roundabouts, the bus station and the new car park exclusive to the public.
Concerned to the roundabouts, in the second map it is possible to notice that both are improvements in Hospital City. There is one in the bottom of the map, connecting the city road wth the Hospital Road, and other in the center of the map, which connects the Ring Road with the Hospital Road.
In 2007, there was a bus stop in the east side of the map. Tree years later, this bus stop was replaced by a bus station, which is located at the south west corner in the second map. In 2007, there was a car park to staff and also opened to the public. However, in 2010, it is possible to see a new car park area to the public and the old car park is, in the second map, just for people who work in the City Hospital.
- Some people believe that nowadays we have too many choices. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? 61
- Living in a country where you have to speak a foreign language can cause serious social problems, as well as practical problems. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? 73
- The chart below shows the percentage of households in owned and rented accomodation in England and Wales between 1918 and 2011.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 67
- The two maps below show road access to a city hospital in 2007 and in 2010.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, second, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 861.0 965.302439024 89% => OK
No of words: 205.0 196.424390244 104% => OK
Chars per words: 4.2 4.92477711251 85% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.78388967377 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.27787642321 2.65546596893 86% => OK
Unique words: 100.0 106.607317073 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.487804878049 0.547539520022 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 259.2 283.868780488 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.7910348715 43.030603864 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.6666666667 112.824112599 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.7777777778 22.9334400587 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.22222222222 5.23603664747 62% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.263621564288 0.215688989381 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.106763554623 0.103423049105 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0655442295899 0.0843802449381 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.185454539968 0.15604864568 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0691986733911 0.0819641961636 84% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.7 13.2329268293 73% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 74.53 61.2550243902 122% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 7.38 11.4140731707 65% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.65 8.06136585366 82% => OK
difficult_words: 25.0 40.7170731707 61% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.