The chart below shows the percentage of households in owned and rented accommodation in England and Wales between 1918 and 2011.
The bar chart reveals the change in the proportion of households owning and renting accommodation in England and Wales over the period from 1918 to 2011. Overall, it is evident that the figure for households in rented accommodation significantly decreased, while the biggest rise was seen in the rate of accommodation which owned. The largest percentage of accommodation renting witnessed in 1918, the opposite was true for the rate of households in owned accommodation in the same year.
It can be seen that the figure for households in owned starting at 21 percent and finishing at approximately 65 percent, which was far higher 44 percent. In addition, the proportion of accommodation owning in 1939 and 1953 were identical, at roughly 31 percent.
About households in rented accommodation, the rate experienced an downward trend that the figure for this category in 2011 declined about 35 percent, compared with the starting point at nearly 80 percent. Approximately 70 percent was the percentage of accommodation which rented in 2939 and 1953. After that, how much households in rented saw a sharp decrease to 31 percent in 2001. Specially, the figure for households owning and renting accommodation in England and Wales were identical, at exactly 1 in every 5.
- The important way to reduce youth crimes is to educate their parents with parental skills To what extent you agree or disagree 89
- The graph below shows the number of tourists visiting a particular Caribbean island between 2010 and 2017 73
- The chart below shows the percentage of households in owned and rented accommodation in England and Wales between 1918 and 2011 67
- The table shows the numbers of visitors to Ashdown Museum during the year before and the year after it was refurbished The charts show the result of surveys asking visitors how satisfied they were with their visit during the same two period Summaries the 67
- Some people believe that it is best to accept a bad situation such as an unsatisfactory job or shortage of money Others argue that it is better to try and improve such situations Discuss both view and give your own opinion 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 64, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...ted accommodation, the rate experienced an downward trend that the figure for this...
^^
Line 5, column 314, Rule ID: MUCH_COUNTABLE[1]
Message: Use 'many' with countable nouns.
Suggestion: many
...ented in 2939 and 1953. After that, how much households in rented saw a sharp decrea...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, while, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 3.97073170732 302% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1068.0 965.302439024 111% => OK
No of words: 205.0 196.424390244 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.20975609756 4.92477711251 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.78388967377 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.15689287676 2.65546596893 119% => OK
Unique words: 102.0 106.607317073 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.49756097561 0.547539520022 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 319.5 283.868780488 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.3871965937 43.030603864 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.666666667 112.824112599 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.7777777778 22.9334400587 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.44444444444 5.23603664747 47% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.355449797293 0.215688989381 165% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.184725152192 0.103423049105 179% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.128351080134 0.0843802449381 152% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.261082666089 0.15604864568 167% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.147434044495 0.0819641961636 180% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.2329268293 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 61.2550243902 80% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.3012195122 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.23 11.4140731707 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.04 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.0658536585 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.