The chart below shows the percentage of people of different age groups who went to the cinema once a month or more in one European country from 2000 to 2011.
The graph illustrates the percentages of 4 different age groups of people that visited the cinema a few times a month in a European country from 2000 to 2011.
Overall, it can be seen from the graph that there is an upward trend in all the figures during the given period. Moreover, the proportion of teenagers from 15 to 24 years old has witnessed a rapid fluctuation.
In 2000, the percentage of youngsters in the 7-14 age group was about 10%, and was nearly 5% lower than the figure for 15-24 years old. Almost a year later, the children aged 7 to 14 saw a slight rise to roughly 15% and had some variation in the next 5 years . Furthermore, in the last 6 years, 15 to 24-year-olds fluctuated noticeably and ended up at over 50% in 2011.
The rates of adults between 25 and 35 years old started at nearly 2% in 2000, followed by the figure aged 35 and over with almost 5%. In addition, those 2 percentages went up steadily until 2016, the 25 to 35-year-olds started to have some sharp variations. In the end, the proportion of people from 25 to 35 years old with 35 and over was respectively approximately 30% and 13%.
- The diagrams below give information about the manufacture of frozen fish pies Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 11
- The diagrams below show the water supply system in Australia at the present and the future Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- Ndjsj 89
- The chart below gives information about global sales of games software CDs and DVD or video 61
- The chart below gives information about global sales of games software CDs and DVD or video 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 259, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...d had some variation in the next 5 years . Furthermore, in the last 6 years, 15 to...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, if, moreover, so, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 33.7804878049 124% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 924.0 965.302439024 96% => OK
No of words: 208.0 196.424390244 106% => OK
Chars per words: 4.44230769231 4.92477711251 90% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.79765784423 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69307018109 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 124.0 106.607317073 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.596153846154 0.547539520022 109% => OK
syllable_count: 255.6 283.868780488 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.2 1.45097560976 83% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 16.8259059522 43.030603864 39% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 102.666666667 112.824112599 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.1111111111 22.9334400587 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.66666666667 5.23603664747 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.1992163797 0.215688989381 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0986161244316 0.103423049105 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.139218551153 0.0843802449381 165% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.173351840002 0.15604864568 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.1814112375 0.0819641961636 221% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 13.2329268293 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 81.97 61.2550243902 134% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.5 10.3012195122 73% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.77 11.4140731707 77% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.59 8.06136585366 94% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.