The chart below shows the price in Euros of 800 grams of four types of bread in one European country from 2001 to 2005
The line graph illustrates how much 800 grams of four different types of bread cost in a European nation from 2001 to 2005.
In general, over the period surveyed, while the cost of wholegrain bread fluctuated, 800 grams of the three other types of bread, namely: brown, white, and rye, tend to cost more.
Between 2001 and 2002, people had to pay more for 800 grams of wholegrain bread than any other types surveyed (0.8 euros vs 0.6 euros). From The cost of wholegrain bread increased dramatically and peaked at 1.8 euros. Similarly, an upward trend was seen for brown and white bread, which reached the price of 1.5 and 1 euro(s), respectively. The only exception was rye bread, which had the figure declined to 0.5 euros in 2002.
In the following years, the cost of wholegrain bread fell significantly to reach its lowest point at nearly 0,6 euros in 2004 before going up slightly by 0.2 euros in 2005. The price of three other types of bread continued to rise. Until 2005, people had to pay 1.6,1.3 and 0.7 euros for 800 grams of brown, white, and rye bread, respectively.
- The line graph shows the number of trips to other countries by UK residents for various purposes between 1989 and 2001 78
- Some teachers think that international student exchange programs would be beneficial for all teenage school students Do you think its advantages will outweigh the disadvantages 73
- Some people think that the most important thing about being rich is it gives a person the opportunity to help other people Do you agree or disagree 61
- There have been many inventions in the human history such as the wheel Some people think the most important thing is the internet To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion 61
- Some people do not go directly to college but travel or work for a short time Do you think the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 87
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, similarly, while, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 888.0 965.302439024 92% => OK
No of words: 191.0 196.424390244 97% => OK
Chars per words: 4.64921465969 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.71756304063 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.39933426436 2.65546596893 90% => OK
Unique words: 104.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.544502617801 0.547539520022 99% => OK
syllable_count: 237.6 283.868780488 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.2 1.45097560976 83% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.0029238641 43.030603864 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.6666666667 112.824112599 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.2222222222 22.9334400587 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.55555555556 5.23603664747 68% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.346752470971 0.215688989381 161% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.162236922394 0.103423049105 157% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0895281335731 0.0843802449381 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.246222038399 0.15604864568 158% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0870165996457 0.0819641961636 106% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 13.2329268293 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 84.0 61.2550243902 137% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.8 10.3012195122 66% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.69 11.4140731707 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.99 8.06136585366 87% => OK
difficult_words: 28.0 40.7170731707 69% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.