The line graph shows the number of trips to other countries by UK residents for various purposes between 1989 and 2001.
The line graph illustrates how many trips to other countries by people in the UK for many different reasons between 1989 and 2001. The table indicates the total number of journeys at five-year intervals over the same period.
Overall, most trips were to go on holidays. Besides, except 2001, the total number of trips increased over the period shown.
Looking first at the line graph, the vast majority of trips to other countries were to go on holiday. For example, in 1989, there were 30 million abroad trips for holidays while there were only under 10 million trips for each of three other categories. This figure peaked in 1998, with 50 million trips before decreasing about 10 million in the following years.
The other categories are for business, family visits, and other purposes. While people tend to go abroad more to visit families since 1992, the trips for business and for other reasons went down to reach their lowest points in 2001.
Regarding the table, an upward trend was seen in the period surveyed. After the total number of trips peaked at 73,5 million trips in 1998, that figure fell slightly to reach 61 million in 2001.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-08-29 | miminguyen | 78 | view |
| 2021-07-26 | Ngoctranthifoe07@ | 84 | view |
| 2021-06-14 | Lâm Yên Chi | 73 | view |
| 2021-05-15 | quynhtran8 | 78 | view |
| 2020-10-02 | Trần Thị Quỳnh Chi | 73 | view |
- The chart below shows the price in Euros of 800 grams of four types of bread in one European country from 2001 to 2005 73
- The charts below show the proportion of people s total spending in a particular European country was spent on different commodities and services in 1958 and 2008
- Some people do not go directly to college but travel or work for a short time Do you think the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 56
- Make comparisons
- The charts below show the performance of a bus company in terms of punctuality both actual and target what actually happened compared to what the company was trying to achieve and the number of complaints from passengers Summarise the information by selec
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 86, Rule ID: NUMEROUS_DIFFERENT[1]
Message: Use simply 'many'.
Suggestion: many
...other countries by people in the UK for many different reasons between 1989 and 2001. The tabl...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, first, if, look, regarding, so, while, for example
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 33.7804878049 115% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 953.0 965.302439024 99% => OK
No of words: 197.0 196.424390244 100% => OK
Chars per words: 4.83756345178 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.74642080493 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.19949888764 2.65546596893 83% => OK
Unique words: 109.0 106.607317073 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.553299492386 0.547539520022 101% => OK
syllable_count: 272.7 283.868780488 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 34.0007292095 43.030603864 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 86.6363636364 112.824112599 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.9090909091 22.9334400587 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.36363636364 5.23603664747 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.366277497867 0.215688989381 170% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.139546617835 0.103423049105 135% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.112436905136 0.0843802449381 133% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.203185315186 0.15604864568 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0861727949307 0.0819641961636 105% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.3 13.2329268293 78% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 71.14 61.2550243902 116% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.3012195122 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.5 11.4140731707 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.29 8.06136585366 90% => OK
difficult_words: 35.0 40.7170731707 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.