The given bar chart illustrates the bifurcation of males and female students pursuing six different art related subjects(Linguistics, Philosophy, English and literature, History and Archeology,Art and Design and Communication and media studies) at a UK base university in the year 2011
Overall, it is observed that in all other subjects except Art and Design, female participation is greater than that of males. Moreover, people prefer studying English language and literature as opposed to History and Archeology and philosophy being the least preferred fields of study.
Philosophy is the only subject where the difference between male and females is the largest with the former leading by 50 units. This is then followed by Linguistics and History and Archeology with females dominating by around 40 and 30 units respectively.
Subjects like art and design along with Communication and media studies experience marginal difference between both genders with females again amping up by 20 units approximately in terms of course preference
- The chart below shows the proportion of male and female students studying six art related subjects at a UK university in 2011 78
- Some people work for the same organisation all their working life Others think that it is better to work for different organisations Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 87
- The chart below shows the proportion of male and female students studying six art related subjects at a UK university in 2011
- The graph below show the percentage of men and woman aged 60 64 who were employed in four countries in 1970 and 2000 Summaries the information by selecting and reporting the main features make comparisons where relevant 78
- The chart below shows the proportion of male and female students studying six art related subjects at a UK university in 2011 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 192, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , Art
...h and literature, History and Archeology,Art and Design and Communication and media ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, moreover, so, then, of course
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 6.8 235% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 23.0 33.7804878049 68% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 890.0 965.302439024 92% => OK
No of words: 158.0 196.424390244 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.63291139241 4.92477711251 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.54539209256 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.23253568785 2.65546596893 122% => OK
Unique words: 102.0 106.607317073 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.645569620253 0.547539520022 118% => OK
syllable_count: 278.1 283.868780488 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.45097560976 124% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 3.36585365854 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 5.0 8.94146341463 56% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 31.0 22.4926829268 138% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 106.743430711 43.030603864 248% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 178.0 112.824112599 158% => OK
Words per sentence: 31.6 22.9334400587 138% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.6 5.23603664747 126% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.310017837546 0.215688989381 144% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.138456415605 0.103423049105 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.139031678596 0.0843802449381 165% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.1807676641 0.15604864568 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.137045673815 0.0819641961636 167% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 20.9 13.2329268293 158% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 23.09 61.2550243902 38% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 6.51609756098 200% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 17.7 10.3012195122 172% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.97 11.4140731707 140% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.37 8.06136585366 129% => OK
difficult_words: 52.0 40.7170731707 128% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 21.0 11.4329268293 184% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.4 10.9970731707 131% => OK
text_standard: 21.0 11.0658536585 190% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.