The chart below shows the results of a survey of people who visited four types of tourist attraction in Britain in the year 1999

Essay topics:

The chart below shows the results of a survey of people who visited four types of tourist attraction in Britain in the year 1999.

The pie chart compares the number of visitors going to 4 different tourist destinations in Britain in the year 1999.
In general, it is clear that most of visitor liked going to Theme Parks, especially Blackpool Pleasure Beach, while only few people chose to go to the Wildlife Parks&Zoo.
Looking at the chart, we can se that the proportion of people who were attracted by Wildfile Park&Zoo was mere 9%, stood at the bottom of the list. Following closely was Historic Houses & Monuments with 16% of people who visted this place. Ranked in the second place was Museum & Galleries visited by 37% of tourists.
The most attractive destination was Theme Parks. In this place, nearly a half of tourists had a visit to Blackpool Pleasure Beach, at 47% followed by Alton Towers and Pleasureland, Southport, at 17% and 16% respectively. Chessington World of Adventure and Legoland, Windsor were least popular places compared to others, at 10% of visitors for each place.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2023-11-10 Daniel3003 78 view
2023-11-10 Daniel3003 73 view
2023-11-10 Daniel3003 67 view
2023-09-15 Phuong1810 78 view
2023-09-15 Phuong1810 view
Essays by user Phuong1810 :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 110, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ks, especially Blackpool Pleasure Beach, while only few people chose to go to the...
^^
Line 5, column 275, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[3]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'were the least'.
Suggestion: were the least
...orld of Adventure and Legoland, Windsor were least popular places compared to others, at 1...
^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, look, second, so, while, in general, in the second place

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 808.0 965.302439024 84% => OK
No of words: 161.0 196.424390244 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.01863354037 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.56210296601 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73718653848 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 109.0 106.607317073 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.67701863354 0.547539520022 124% => OK
syllable_count: 234.0 283.868780488 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.8113321959 43.030603864 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.0 112.824112599 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.125 22.9334400587 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.5 5.23603664747 143% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.171545515898 0.215688989381 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.077865079339 0.103423049105 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0674030854884 0.0843802449381 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.114086025449 0.15604864568 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0795499391311 0.0819641961636 97% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.2329268293 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 61.2550243902 97% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.84 11.4140731707 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.04 8.06136585366 112% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 40.7170731707 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.