The chart below shows the total number of minutes in billion of telephone calls in the UK divided into three categories from 1995 2002

Essay topics:

The chart below shows the total number of minutes in billion of telephone calls in the UK divided into three categories from 1995 2002

The bar chart depicts, the duration of phone calls in UK, in three catagories between 1995 to 2002.
Overall, the vertical lines shows the duration of call in minutes(billions) and time period by horizental lines. In whole time period, local call from fixed line graph was highest and all call from mobiles was lowest.
To begin with, in 1995, local call was accounted just over 70 minutes and gradually increased til 1999 and reached the highest point at 90 minutes in billion. Afterward, the graph start decreasing by approximately 5 minutes in 2000 and 2001, was recorded roughly 85 and 80 minutes respectively, however, in 2002, local calls arrived at the same point of 1995.
Similarly, national and international call was just above 35 minutes in 1995 and whote time period it was slightly climed by 3 to 5 minutes and end with around 61 minutes in 2002. Moreover, the lowest graph was mobile calls and calculated below 5 minutes in 1995, whereas, till 1999, there was gradually increases in data, hence from 2000 to 2002, we can see significant changes in mobile calls and climbed upto around 40 minutes in 2002, as the highest point of mobile calls.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2023-11-26 Ahmad_off 70 view
2023-11-26 Ahmad_off view
2023-11-12 Daniel3003 56 view
2023-11-12 Daniel3003 78 view
2023-11-12 Daniel3003 56 view
Essays by user asmita acharya :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 9, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...tagories between 1995 to 2002. Overall, the vertical lines shows the duration of...
^^
Line 3, column 151, Rule ID: NODT_DOZEN[1]
Message: Use simply: 'a billion'.
Suggestion: a billion
...ched the highest point at 90 minutes in billion. Afterward, the graph start decreasing ...
^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
hence, however, if, moreover, similarly, whereas, to begin with

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 6.8 162% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 33.7804878049 115% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 962.0 965.302439024 100% => OK
No of words: 199.0 196.424390244 101% => OK
Chars per words: 4.83417085427 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.75589349951 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57603251858 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 110.0 106.607317073 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.552763819095 0.547539520022 101% => OK
syllable_count: 275.4 283.868780488 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 22.4926829268 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 65.0437843114 43.030603864 151% => OK
Chars per sentence: 137.428571429 112.824112599 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.4285714286 22.9334400587 124% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.0 5.23603664747 172% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.293979586369 0.215688989381 136% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.15511199673 0.103423049105 150% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0553792402309 0.0843802449381 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.196157697355 0.15604864568 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0522869348434 0.0819641961636 64% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 13.2329268293 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.98 61.2550243902 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.8 10.3012195122 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.03 11.4140731707 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.6 8.06136585366 107% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 40.7170731707 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.9970731707 120% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.