the chart below shows the total number of minutes in billions of telephone calls in the UK divided into three categories from 1995 2002 summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant

Essay topics:

the chart below shows the total number of minutes (in billions) of telephone calls in the UK, divided into three categories, from 1995 - 2002.
summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The following chart provides some information about the people of United Kingdom made how many billion minutes calls via Local, National and International fixed lines, and Mobile during a 7-year period from 1995 to 2002.
As can be clearly observed from the chart, there are two trends: upward and downward based on the number of minutes of calls. Despite the fact that there was a significant increase in Local fixed line calls from 1995 to 1999, the calls through Local fixed line experienced a dramatic decrease from 90 billion minutes to nearly 70 billion minutes during 1999 to 2002.
On the other hand, both National and International fixed line and Mobile calls witnessed a sharp climb within 1995 to 2002. The former went up drastically from under 40 billion minutes to slightly above 60 billion minutes. At the same time, the latter rose dramatically from around 5 billion minutes to about 45 billion minutes. In addition, the calls via Mobile were always far less than National and International fixed line calls during 1995 to 2002.
It is clear from the chart that the calls which were made by Local fixed line were always significantly more than both Mobile and National and International fixed line.

Votes
Average: 6.7 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2023-10-24 MinyiChu 67 view
2023-08-24 LUCIALUSO 78 view
2023-07-31 teulimin.06 10 view
2022-09-06 Iqreet Kaur 84 view
2022-05-31 vananhxh2005 view
Essays by user sattar_iust :

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so, in addition, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1015.0 965.302439024 105% => OK
No of words: 204.0 196.424390244 104% => OK
Chars per words: 4.97549019608 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.77926670891 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.47355777808 2.65546596893 93% => OK
Unique words: 107.0 106.607317073 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.524509803922 0.547539520022 96% => OK
syllable_count: 306.0 283.868780488 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.1022392214 43.030603864 116% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.875 112.824112599 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.5 22.9334400587 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.75 5.23603664747 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.218032714295 0.215688989381 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.114927011165 0.103423049105 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0360915781098 0.0843802449381 43% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.151928509543 0.15604864568 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0544735307477 0.0819641961636 66% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 13.2329268293 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 61.2550243902 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.3012195122 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.9 11.4140731707 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.43 8.06136585366 92% => OK
difficult_words: 33.0 40.7170731707 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 18.0 11.4329268293 157% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.