The chart below shows the total number of minutes (in billions) of telephone calls in the UK, divided into three categories, from 1995-2002.
This graph show the trend of three different call type being used in the UK since 1995 to 2002.
We can see that national and international call and mobiles are being used more frequently, while local phone calls remain stability. But it is obviously that people spend more time on using phone call.
First of all, I noticed the dramatically rose in mobile catalogue, it experienced a 15 times growth during 1995 to 2002. In contrast Local phone call once have a growth from above 70 to 90 billion but it went back down to 70 again. Moreover National and international calls steadily growth to around 60 billion in 2002, whereas it being used nearly 40 billion minutes in 1995.
It is clear that because of the rising figure for national and international and mobile catalogue , the total number of minutes of telephone calls in the UK increase in these 7 years from around 110 million to 180 million, which is definitely a stunning performance.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-11-26 | Ahmad_off | 70 | view |
| 2023-11-26 | Ahmad_off | view | |
| 2023-11-12 | Daniel3003 | 56 | view |
| 2023-11-12 | Daniel3003 | 78 | view |
| 2023-11-12 | Daniel3003 | 56 | view |
- The chart below shows the percentage of households in owned and rented accommodation in England and Wales between 1918 and 2011
- The chart below shows the total number of minutes in billions of telephone calls in the UK divided into three categories from 1995 2002
- The chart below shows the total number of minutes in billions of telephone calls in the UK divided into three categories from 1995 2002 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 12, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error - use third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'shows'.
Suggestion: shows
This graph show the trend of three different call type ...
^^^^
Line 3, column 125, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[2]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: contrast,
...15 times growth during 1995 to 2002. In contrast Local phone call once have a growth fro...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 233, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Moreover,
...lion but it went back down to 70 again. Moreover National and international calls steadi...
^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 98, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...l and international and mobile catalogue , the total number of minutes of telephon...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, moreover, whereas, while, in contrast, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 12.0 5.60731707317 214% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 27.0 33.7804878049 80% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 785.0 965.302439024 81% => OK
No of words: 165.0 196.424390244 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.75757575758 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.58402463422 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62297347277 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 103.0 106.607317073 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.624242424242 0.547539520022 114% => OK
syllable_count: 236.7 283.868780488 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 1.53170731707 326% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.7651847506 43.030603864 137% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.142857143 112.824112599 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.5714285714 22.9334400587 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.57142857143 5.23603664747 183% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.293316008494 0.215688989381 136% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.128278245166 0.103423049105 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0736510943119 0.0843802449381 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.17305054429 0.15604864568 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0657814649434 0.0819641961636 80% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.2329268293 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 61.2550243902 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.62 11.4140731707 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.65 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 30.0 40.7170731707 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.