the chart below shows the total number of minutes (in billions) of telephone calls in the UK, divided into three categories, from 1995-2002.

Essay topics:

the chart below shows the total number of minutes (in billions) of telephone calls in the UK, divided into three categories, from 1995-2002.

The given bar chart clearly presents information about the total number of minutes (measured in billions) of telephone calls in the UK, divided into 3 selected categories (local-fixed line, national and international-fixed line, and mobiles) from 1995 to 2002. Overall, it is evident that there are 2 general trends: an upward and a downward.
In detail, it can be explained that the upward trend belonged to the trend of mobile and that of national and international line because the number of minutes of mobiles increased greatly from only 4 billion minutes in 1995 to 45 billion minutes in 2002. Meanwhile, that of national and international line rose moderately from 38 minutes in the first year to 68 billion minutes in the last year. On the other hand, the trend of local line experienced the downward trend because there were a gradual climb from 72 billion minutes in 1995 to maximum at 90 billion minutes in the last year.
Finally, it is interesting that, although the trend of local line underwent downward trend, its figures were considered the most popular in the UK when it be compared with other types in each year.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2020-01-14 Nguyễn Thành Vinh 73 view
2020-01-06 aghasaeed 78 view
2019-12-22 rahulsd 67 view
2019-12-04 morbymuku 56 view
2019-11-28 Saeed Najd Ataei 78 view

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
The given bar chart clearly presents inf...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 86, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e trend of local line underwent downward trend, its figures were considered the m...
^^
Line 3, column 158, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'is'?
Suggestion: is
...ered the most popular in the UK when it be compared with other types in each year....
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, while, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 10.0 5.60731707317 178% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 941.0 965.302439024 97% => OK
No of words: 192.0 196.424390244 98% => OK
Chars per words: 4.90104166667 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.72241943641 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77376391858 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 102.0 106.607317073 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.53125 0.547539520022 97% => OK
syllable_count: 290.7 283.868780488 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 1.53170731707 326% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 32.0 22.4926829268 142% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 61.6864833024 43.030603864 143% => OK
Chars per sentence: 156.833333333 112.824112599 139% => OK
Words per sentence: 32.0 22.9334400587 140% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.66666666667 5.23603664747 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.304542254623 0.215688989381 141% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.151719513569 0.103423049105 147% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.128588180655 0.0843802449381 152% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.198668572338 0.15604864568 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.132185625808 0.0819641961636 161% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.6 13.2329268293 133% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.46 61.2550243902 77% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 10.3012195122 142% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.73 11.4140731707 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.51 8.06136585366 106% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.5 11.4329268293 162% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.8 10.9970731707 135% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.0658536585 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.