The chart below shows the total numbers of minutes (in billions) of telephone calls in the UK, divided into three categories from 1995 to 2002.
The bar chart gives information about the time spent by British people on three particular types of telephone calls between 1995 and 2002.
In general, the local fixed line was the most common means of communication. Both national and international fixed lines and mobiles had an upward trend, while local fixed lines fell back on the half of the period.
At the beginning of the period, local fixed-line calls were the highest and two times as much as the total number of minutes of national and international fixed-line calls. People spent the least time making phone calls through mobiles, at nearly 5 billion minutes in 1995. The local -fixed lines grew gradually before hitting its peak, at 90 billion minutes. In contrast, there was a slow rise in the time spent making mobile calls, from over 5 to 15 billion minutes.
After peaking, the local fixed call has a nearly 20 billion minutes reduction of making phone calls. Mobile calls were a particularly noticeable rise between 1999 and 2002, during which time the use of mobile phones tripled. The growth slowed over the last two years was national and international line fixed
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-08-09 | Trần Như Cát Tường | 95 | view |
| 2023-03-18 | nguyet141201 | view | |
| 2023-03-10 | calarasl | 67 | view |
| 2023-01-04 | giangngoc | 78 | view |
| 2022-09-30 | lattethuc | 56 | view |
- The bar chart shows the types of media that people of different age groups used to get daily news in one country in 2011 78
- The pie chart gives information on UAE government spending in 2000 The total budget was ADE 135 billion
- Childhood obesity has become a serious problem in recent years What are the primary causes of this What measures should be taken to reduce childhood obesity 61
- The diagram shows how chocolate is produced Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- Some people think that it is more beneficial to take part in sports which are played in teams like football while other people think that taking part in individual sports is bteer like tennis or swimming Discuss both views and give your opinion 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
while, in contrast, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 946.0 965.302439024 98% => OK
No of words: 192.0 196.424390244 98% => OK
Chars per words: 4.92708333333 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.72241943641 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.4684642943 2.65546596893 93% => OK
Unique words: 108.0 106.607317073 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.5625 0.547539520022 103% => OK
syllable_count: 288.0 283.868780488 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 3.36585365854 238% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 28.6209713322 43.030603864 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.6 112.824112599 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.2 22.9334400587 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.0 5.23603664747 57% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.169002706695 0.215688989381 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0758663233907 0.103423049105 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.06868705043 0.0843802449381 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.11744362671 0.15604864568 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.079715321268 0.0819641961636 97% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 13.2329268293 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 61.2550243902 99% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.31 11.4140731707 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.79 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.