The chart below shows the value of one country's exports in various categories during 2015 and 2016. The table shows the percentage change in each category of exports in 2016 compared with 2015. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The value of a country's exports may vary in various categories in differents years. Usually, the percentage of changes of exports earning with differ by year and category. Here is some information about a country's exports earning based on the year 2015 and 2016.
First, I will start with the country's most money-making export which is petroleum products. By the year 2016, the country gained 3% more in the category than the year 2015. However, for gems and jewellery, the percentage of the export earning decrease by 5.18% by the year 2016.
Next, engineered goods earnings also follow the foot steps of petroleum product earnings by gaining more than 8% on 2016 than 2015. The value increases from more than 50 billions to more than 60 billions in just a year, This statistic also conclude that the engineers in the country have gained more by the year 2016.
Besides that, agricultural products and textiles also earned more with 0,81% and 15,24% respectively. Even though, agricultural products does not gain more than 1%, it stills conclude that the products are still wanted by many people as it earned about more than 30 billions for both years.
While for textures, it is seens that it gains it popularity in the year 2016. This is proved, when the statistic states that the earning was increased by more than 15,24% in the year 2016 based on the year 2015. Textiles products earned about more than 25 billions in 2015 and earned more than 30 billions the next year.
In conclusion, we can see that this country has overall succeed in the year 2016 than the year 2015. The country managed to gain about more than 22% in the year 2016. Even though gems and jewellery had a decreasing of earnings by 5.18% it is still the third money-making export product from the country.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-03-29 | minhnhat2002 | 78 | view |
| 2024-01-20 | hoaithuongnguyen283 | 84 | view |
| 2024-01-20 | hoaithuongnguyen283 | 80 | view |
| 2024-01-20 | hoaithuongnguyen283 | 73 | view |
| 2023-12-09 | Tosyne | 78 | view |
- Some people believe that it is best to accept a bad situation such as an unsatisfactory job or shortage if money Others argues that it is better to try and improve such situations Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 56
- Some children spend a long time each day on their smartphones Why is this Is this a positive or a negative development 56
- The charts below show the average percentages in typical meals of three types of nutrients all of which may be unhealthy if eaten too much Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- Increasing the price of petrol is the best way to solve growing traffic and pollution problems To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- Some people believe computers are more important in education while others believe teachers are more important Discuss both views and give your opinion 56
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, first, however, if, may, so, still, third, well, while, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 1.00243902439 299% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 3.15609756098 253% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 17.0 5.60731707317 303% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 41.0 33.7804878049 121% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1485.0 965.302439024 154% => OK
No of words: 309.0 196.424390244 157% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.80582524272 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1926597562 3.73543355544 112% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.42979794571 2.65546596893 92% => OK
Unique words: 135.0 106.607317073 127% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.436893203883 0.547539520022 80% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 406.8 283.868780488 143% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 1.53170731707 392% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.07073170732 374% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 8.94146341463 179% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 34.9982142402 43.030603864 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.8125 112.824112599 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.3125 22.9334400587 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.25 5.23603664747 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 3.83414634146 156% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 3.70975609756 243% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.194574109422 0.215688989381 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.106260101453 0.103423049105 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0739813868154 0.0843802449381 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.150907452124 0.15604864568 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.113929390494 0.0819641961636 139% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.9 13.2329268293 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 77.57 61.2550243902 127% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 10.3012195122 70% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.62 11.4140731707 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.34 8.06136585366 91% => OK
difficult_words: 54.0 40.7170731707 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 11.4329268293 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 7.0 11.0658536585 63% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, first, however, if, may, so, still, third, well, while, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 1.00243902439 299% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 3.15609756098 253% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 17.0 5.60731707317 303% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 41.0 33.7804878049 121% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1485.0 965.302439024 154% => OK
No of words: 309.0 196.424390244 157% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.80582524272 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1926597562 3.73543355544 112% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.42979794571 2.65546596893 92% => OK
Unique words: 135.0 106.607317073 127% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.436893203883 0.547539520022 80% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 406.8 283.868780488 143% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 1.53170731707 392% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.07073170732 374% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 8.94146341463 179% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 34.9982142402 43.030603864 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.8125 112.824112599 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.3125 22.9334400587 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.25 5.23603664747 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 3.83414634146 156% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 3.70975609756 243% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.194574109422 0.215688989381 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.106260101453 0.103423049105 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0739813868154 0.0843802449381 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.150907452124 0.15604864568 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.113929390494 0.0819641961636 139% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.9 13.2329268293 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 77.57 61.2550243902 127% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 10.3012195122 70% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.62 11.4140731707 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.34 8.06136585366 91% => OK
difficult_words: 54.0 40.7170731707 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 11.4329268293 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 7.0 11.0658536585 63% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.