The chart below shows the value of one country s exports in various categories during 2015 and 2016

Essay topics:

The chart below shows the value of one country's exports in various categories during 2015 and 2016.

The bar graph delineates the money earned from exports of one country on the basis of various categories in the years 2015 and 2016. The table illustrates the change in percentage of various categories from the year 2015 to 2016.

Overall, the amount earned in the exports was reported being almost higher in the year 2016 for all products except, the trend was contradictory for Gems and jewelry. Moreover, Textiles recorded the highest percentage change while the Petroleum products manifested the lowest per cent change.

The graph depicted that the amount earned 2 billion greater than the previous year for the Petroleum products. However, for the Engineered goods the rate remained merely decreased by 6 billion and 2 billion in 2015 and 2016, respectively. The pattern for Gems and jewelry was opposite as the earnings were greater in 2015(44 billion) than in 2016(42 billion). For the further products, like Agricultural products, the earnings were almost equal but, for Textiles the money obtained in 2016 were 6 billion higher than in 2015.

On the other hand, the table demonstrated that the rate change for Petroleum products and Engineered goods was 3% and 8. 5%, respectively. It is evident that the per cent change was a minimum of 0.81 for Agricultural products. However, for Gems and jewelry(5.18%) the change in the amount was roughly increased by three times for Textiles, that is 15.24%.

Votes
Average: 6.7 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2024-03-29 minhnhat2002 78 view
2024-01-20 hoaithuongnguyen283 84 view
2024-01-20 hoaithuongnguyen283 80 view
2024-01-20 hoaithuongnguyen283 73 view
2023-12-09 Tosyne 78 view
Essays by user Surbhi96 :

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, moreover, while, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 7.0 171% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 33.7804878049 71% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1180.0 965.302439024 122% => OK
No of words: 231.0 196.424390244 118% => OK
Chars per words: 5.10822510823 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.89854898053 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68091571733 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 108.0 106.607317073 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.467532467532 0.547539520022 85% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 333.9 283.868780488 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.33902439024 184% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.1381617148 43.030603864 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.272727273 112.824112599 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0 22.9334400587 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.72727272727 5.23603664747 90% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.13525962069 0.215688989381 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0655154610213 0.103423049105 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.10835473549 0.0843802449381 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.11576641523 0.15604864568 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.14393957246 0.0819641961636 176% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.2329268293 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 61.2550243902 110% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.36 11.4140731707 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.03 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 40.7170731707 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.