The chart below shows the waste disposal in 1 European country in four years 2005, 2006, 2007 and 2008.
The bar chart illustrates the average amount of garbage disposal in a European country in terms of the landfill, burning and dumping at sea in a period from 2005 to 2008.
Overall, the amount of rubbish was buried decreased steadily during the whole period. In contrast, there was an upward trend in the figure for waste disposal by burning.
In 2005, 1800 million tons of waste went into landfill. This number declined to 1200 million tons in the next year and continued to fall until 2008 when the amount was just one-third of the figure for 2005. Although landfill was the most prevalent trash disposal way until 2007, the amount of waste burned exceeded the figure for rubbish disposal by landfill in 2008.
While only about 500 million tons of garbage was incinerated in 2005, this number went up stably over the years and reached a peak of around 900 million tones at the end of the period. However, dumping at sea witnessed a fluctuation in the amount of waste removed in the period. From 600 million tons in 2005, this figure rose to over 600 million tons in the following year and then decreased steadily to around 550 million tons in 2008.
- The graph below shows the number of overseas visitors to three different areas in a European country between 1987 and 2007 1 82
- The best way to resolve international environmental problems is to increase the cost of fuel. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 61
- The table gives information about the average annual spending of university students in three different countries. 67
- The table below shows the percentage of the population by age groups inone town who rode bicycles in 2011 78
- The charts below show the percentage of water used for different purposes in six areasof the world. 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, then, third, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 33.7804878049 136% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 952.0 965.302439024 99% => OK
No of words: 203.0 196.424390244 103% => OK
Chars per words: 4.68965517241 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.77462671648 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.28527896313 2.65546596893 86% => OK
Unique words: 98.0 106.607317073 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.48275862069 0.547539520022 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 272.7 283.868780488 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.3649288693 43.030603864 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.777777778 112.824112599 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5555555556 22.9334400587 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.44444444444 5.23603664747 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 1.13902439024 439% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.221536474425 0.215688989381 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0994784697866 0.103423049105 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0662923294693 0.0843802449381 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.148422797355 0.15604864568 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0730813821185 0.0819641961636 89% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 13.2329268293 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 74.53 61.2550243902 122% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.22 11.4140731707 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.29 8.06136585366 90% => OK
difficult_words: 33.0 40.7170731707 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.