The table below shows the percentage of the population by age groups in
one town who rode bicycles in 2011
The table compares the proportion of the population of one town who cycled in 2011,
according to five age groups.
Overall, it is clear that in all the age groups, the percentage of female cyclists was higher
than male cyclists. However, for both genders, the proportion of the population who rode
bicycles was lowest between the ages of 18 and 59.
Just over half of all females and males rode bicycles in the age group 0-9, and this
proportion remained high among 10-17 year old girls, at about 42%.However, among
boys aged 10-17, the percentage who cycled declined by over half to less than 25%.
The figures for the 18-39 and 40-59 year olds are much lower. In the former age group,
only about 17% of women cycled, compared with just under 10% of men. Between the
ages of 40 and 59, the figures fell further, to a little over 12% for women and 8 per cent
for men.
However, the percentage of those over 60 who rode bicycles then rose significantly,
reaching 18.5% for women compared with around 13% for men.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-27 | tranhien297 | 78 | view |
| 2019-10-14 | haieric96 | 73 | view |
| 2019-05-28 | Nguyen Trong Trung | 78 | view |
| 2019-05-14 | ai diem | 61 | view |
| 2019-04-28 | tuanly | 78 | view |
- The diagram below shows the changes of a village in 1995 and now. 67
- The table gives information about the average annual spending of university students in three different countries. 67
- The chart below shows the waste disposal in 1 European country in four years 2005, 2006, 2007 and 2008. 61
- The pie charts below show the average household expenditures in Japan and Malaysia in the year 2010. 73
- The graph below shows the number of overseas visitors to three different areas in a European country between 1987 and 2007. 56
Transition Words or Phrases used:
so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 752.0 965.302439024 78% => OK
No of words: 151.0 196.424390244 77% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.98013245033 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.50545371207 3.73543355544 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58223801381 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 86.0 106.607317073 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.569536423841 0.547539520022 104% => OK
syllable_count: 230.4 283.868780488 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 35.2080867841 43.030603864 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.0 112.824112599 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.875 22.9334400587 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.125 5.23603664747 21% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 11.0 3.83414634146 287% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.339135950725 0.215688989381 157% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.14968117786 0.103423049105 145% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.116578542763 0.0843802449381 138% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.106197287129 0.15604864568 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0965120297946 0.0819641961636 118% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 13.2329268293 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 61.2550243902 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.6 11.4140731707 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.19 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 35.0 40.7170731707 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.