The chart below shows what Anthropology graduates from one university did after finishing their undergraduate degree course. The table shows the salaries of the anthropologists in work after five years.
Summaries the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The pie chart illustrates the percentage of Anthropology graduates from a university who choose six different kinds of jobs, and the table gives the data on the earnings they get after five years working.
In general, these students preferred full-time job than the others. Plus, they earned the highest salary when they worked in government sector after five years.
As you can see on the pie graph, the proportion of full-time workers accounted for over a half percentage while the opposite was true for part-time+ postgrad study at only 5 percent. Moreover, the figures for full-time postgrad study and not know shared the same 8 percent. Lastly, the level of students who were unemployed and part-time workers stood at 15 and 12 percent, respectively.
Furthermore, the percentage of graduated people of Anthropology course had the income over $100,000 at 50 percent in government sector whereas the figure for private companies and freelance consultants were at 30 and 40 percent, respectively. Normally, when these students worked in the three types of jobs after 5 years, a few numbers of them got the lowest income in $25,000-$49,999 from around 5 to 10 percent.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-08-08 | nguyendangquang.aspect | view | |
| 2023-10-05 | dhphuc7866 | 73 | view |
| 2023-09-19 | steveminh | 84 | view |
| 2023-07-17 | Bùi Xuân Tiến | 50 | view |
| 2023-06-25 | Dipesh1234 | 73 | view |
- The chart below shows what Anthropology graduates from one university did after finishing their undergraduate degree course The table shows the salaries of the anthropologists in work after five years Summaries the information by selecting and reporting t 89
- The graphs above give information about computer ownership as a percentage of the population between 2002 and 2010 and by level of education for the years 2002 and 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make compar 78
- In some cultures children are often told that they can achieve anything if they try hard enough What are the advantages and disadvantages of giving children this message 78
- The diagram below shows how geothermal energy is used to produce electricity Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 89
- A person s worth nowadays seems to be judged according to social status and material possessions Old fashioned values such as honour kindness and trust no longer seem important To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion Give reasons for you 69
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, if, lastly, moreover, whereas, while, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 981.0 965.302439024 102% => OK
No of words: 191.0 196.424390244 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.13612565445 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.71756304063 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84748413421 2.65546596893 107% => OK
Unique words: 117.0 106.607317073 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.612565445026 0.547539520022 112% => OK
syllable_count: 288.9 283.868780488 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.3668356175 43.030603864 136% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.625 112.824112599 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.875 22.9334400587 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.625 5.23603664747 146% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.13332976338 0.215688989381 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0609235630352 0.103423049105 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0767129034484 0.0843802449381 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.103065276861 0.15604864568 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0799233655531 0.0819641961636 98% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.2329268293 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 61.2550243902 92% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.83 11.4140731707 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.58 8.06136585366 106% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 40.7170731707 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.