The chart shows the different ways of dealing with the garbage in four countries
The bar chart illustrates how to dispose of the garbage through four different ways in Netherlands、Italy、Spain and the UK.
It is clear that the most frequent way of coping with garbage used by the UK、Italy and Spain is landfill.（60%、about 50% and 45% respectively）While the number in Netherlands is just around 5%.
However, more than 40% of garbage is recycled in Netherlands which ranks the first among four countries, next come Spain and UK (about 30%). The measure of burning garbage accounts for 40% in Netherlands, which is twice as much as that of in Italy and Spain. The proportion of biologically treated in Netherlands is about 10%, with UK following closely. The figure of that in Italy is the same as in Spain.
Overall, most of the garbage is dealt with through landfill in Italy、Spain and the UK, whereas Netherlands prefers recycling.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-19 | hahoaan | 78 | view |
| 2024-11-12 | Huyenlbg87 | 84 | view |
| 2024-11-10 | Giang Tran | 84 | view |
| 2024-11-10 | Giang Tran | 84 | view |
| 2024-11-10 | Giang Tran | 84 | view |
- Children can learn effectively from watching TV Therefore they should be encouraged to watch TV regularly both at home and at school To what extent do you agree or disagree 81
- Thechart showsthedifferentwaysofdealingwiththegarbageinfourcountries 11
- Children can learn effectively from watching TV. Therefore, they should be encouraged to watch TV regularly both at home and at school. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 61
- Children can learn effectively from watching TV. Therefore, they should be encouraged to watch TV regularly both at home and at school. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 50
- Children can learn effectively from watching TV. Therefore, they should be encouraged to watch TV regularly both at home and at school. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 353, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...s about 10%, with UK following closely. The figure of that in Italy is the same as ...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 739.0 965.302439024 77% => OK
No of words: 142.0 196.424390244 72% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.20422535211 4.92477711251 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.45201032557 3.73543355544 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.81393783395 2.65546596893 144% => OK
Unique words: 80.0 106.607317073 75% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.56338028169 0.547539520022 103% => OK
syllable_count: 205.2 283.868780488 72% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.2913985212 43.030603864 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.571428571 112.824112599 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2857142857 22.9334400587 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.85714285714 5.23603664747 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.200349122404 0.215688989381 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.100692978627 0.103423049105 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0860008927949 0.0843802449381 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.15171607732 0.15604864568 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0815104265627 0.0819641961636 99% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.2329268293 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 61.2550243902 111% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.88 11.4140731707 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.52 8.06136585366 93% => OK
difficult_words: 26.0 40.7170731707 64% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 150 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.