The chart below shows the percentage of the whole world population in four countries from 1950-2002,withprojectionsto2050.
The bar chart illustrates the changes in the population of four countries between 1950 and 2002, with predictions to 2050.
The proportion of the world population in China and India was much more than that of in the USA and Japan from 1950 to 2002. Before being projected to drop significantly to around 19% in 2050, China’s population occupied just over 25% in 1950 which ranked the first. On the contrary, the percentage of population in India showed an upward trend between 1950 and 2002, and then it will increase to about 21% in 2050, overtaking that of in China.
The percentage of the world population in the USA and Japan was less than the rest of countries. The population of USA took up 10% in 1950, which was two times the quantity of Japan. However, it is projected to decrease moderately to nearly 8% in 2050, the same number as in 2002. The population of Japan witnessed downward trend from 1950 to 2002, followed by being expected to about 3%.
Overall, the population of China and India will still much more than that of the USA and Japan in 2050.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-10-15 | Oliviachenlu | 67 | view |
- The chart shows the different ways of dealing with the garbage in four countries 55
- Some people believe that spending money on developing technology for space exploration is unjustifiable there are more beneficial ways to spend money To what extent do you agree or disagree 71
- Some people believe that the only purpose of films is to entertain, while others say that films also have educational value. Discuss both views and give your own opinion. 73
- Children can learn effectively from watching TV. Therefore, they should be encouraged to watch TV regularly both at home and at school. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 61
- Some people believe that certain old buildings should be preserved more than others. What types of old buildings should be preserved? Do you think the advantages of preserving old buildings outweigh the disadvantages? 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, still, then, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 33.7804878049 139% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 3.97073170732 227% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 896.0 965.302439024 93% => OK
No of words: 191.0 196.424390244 97% => OK
Chars per words: 4.69109947644 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.71756304063 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57300946964 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 90.0 106.607317073 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.471204188482 0.547539520022 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 251.1 283.868780488 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.33902439024 184% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 27.2319710435 43.030603864 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.5555555556 112.824112599 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.2222222222 22.9334400587 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.33333333333 5.23603664747 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.319197092443 0.215688989381 148% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.146469508833 0.103423049105 142% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0852061862585 0.0843802449381 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.202868601316 0.15604864568 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0974887098118 0.0819641961636 119% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 13.2329268293 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 75.54 61.2550243902 123% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.3012195122 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.92 11.4140731707 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.49 8.06136585366 93% => OK
difficult_words: 34.0 40.7170731707 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.