The chart shows how frequently people in the USA ate in fast food restaurants between 2003 and 2013

Essay topics:

The chart shows how frequently people in the USA ate in fast food restaurants between 2003 and 2013.

The bar graph illustrates the frequency of Americans visiting fast food restaurant in 2003, 2006 and 2013.

Overall, Either, mostly Americans frequently visited once a week or, once or twice a month to fast food restaurant in three years period. However, there are minor proportions of Americans who neither visit fast food restaurant and visit every day in a fast-food restaurant.

As seen in the bar diagram, there are similar proportions of Americans who visited fast food restaurant once a week and few times in a month in 2003 which was 30%. However, there was a difference of 12% in the year 2006 as Americans visit frequently to eat once a week in fast food restaurant as compared to Americans visiting once or twice a month. In contrast, Americans had visited more often to fast food restaurant in a month compared to once a week which was excess by 7%.

Followed by, approximately 16% of Americans visited fast food restaurant frequently in a week in 2003 and 2013 whereas, 20% of Americans visited in 2006. Similarly, 13% of Americans visited fast food restaurant only a few times in a year in 2003 while, 15% of Americans visited few times in a year to eat fast food in 2006 and 2013.

Americans who went every day to fast food restaurant and who neither visited it in three year period were comprised of less than 5%.

Votes
Average: 5.6 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2024-06-15 Zahid6400 56 view
2024-02-19 MinyiChu 56 view
2023-12-29 Ahmad_off 67 view
2023-12-29 Ahmad_off 56 view
2023-12-29 Ahmad_off 56 view
Essays by user mangpahang :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 159, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...d few times in a month in 2003 which was 30%. However, there was a difference of...
^^
Line 9, column 102, Rule ID: WERE_COMPRISED_OF[1]
Message: Did you mean 'comprised' or 'were composed of'?
Suggestion: comprised; were composed of
...neither visited it in three year period were comprised of less than 5%.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, similarly, whereas, while, in contrast

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1108.0 965.302439024 115% => OK
No of words: 234.0 196.424390244 119% => OK
Chars per words: 4.73504273504 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.91114542567 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71903703417 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 88.0 106.607317073 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.376068376068 0.547539520022 69% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 335.7 283.868780488 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 24.1251879031 43.030603864 56% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 123.111111111 112.824112599 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.0 22.9334400587 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.66666666667 5.23603664747 108% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 3.70975609756 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.09268292683 220% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.241040001209 0.215688989381 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.163594660922 0.103423049105 158% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0474651638242 0.0843802449381 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.190452960023 0.15604864568 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0542667403891 0.0819641961636 66% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.2329268293 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 62.01 61.2550243902 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.51 11.4140731707 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.82 8.06136585366 85% => OK
difficult_words: 28.0 40.7170731707 69% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.

Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.