The chart shows the main methods of transportation for people traveling to a university for work or study in 2004 and 2009. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons wherever relevant.
The two pie charts reveal changes in the usage of transportation to travel to a particular university over the course of 5 years from 2004 to 2009. It can be seen that car and bus were the most significant mode of transport during these years surveyed.
There was an upward trend in the category of “bus” which its figure increased by 13% from 33% in the first year to 46% in the last year. Similarly, the rate of used bicycles witnessed a nearly twofold growth, accounting for just 9% in 2004 then rose to 16% five years afterwards. This was followed by the figure for train and walking but at a slower pace, making up 3% and 4% in the first year then increased to only 4% and 6% in the last year respectively. By contrast, an only decline occurred in the proportion of cars used, experiencing an approximately twofold decrease, which its percentage dropped from 51 in 2004 to 28 during a 5-year period.
- The chart below shows the expenditure of two countries on consumer goods in 2010 11
- Nowadays more people are choosing to socialize online rather than face to face is this a positive or negative development 84
- The graph below gives information about US government spending on research between 1980 and 2008 50
- The pie charts provided illustrate two major changes in the use of modes of transport to a certain university between 2004 and 2009 78
- The charts below show the proportions of British students at one university in England who were able to speak other languages in addition to English in 2000 and 2010 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, similarly, then
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 747.0 965.302439024 77% => OK
No of words: 165.0 196.424390244 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.52727272727 4.92477711251 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.58402463422 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73612032879 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 104.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.630303030303 0.547539520022 115% => OK
syllable_count: 217.8 283.868780488 77% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 22.4926829268 120% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 28.2292204797 43.030603864 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.5 112.824112599 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.5 22.9334400587 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.16666666667 5.23603664747 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 2.0 3.83414634146 52% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.104674254011 0.215688989381 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0586566603337 0.103423049105 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0552051534524 0.0843802449381 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0953261626844 0.15604864568 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.034942054335 0.0819641961636 43% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.2329268293 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 69.45 61.2550243902 113% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.29 11.4140731707 81% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.13 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 33.0 40.7170731707 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.9970731707 116% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.