The chart shows the number of international students from four different countries applying for universities in a European country from the year 2004 to 2008.
The chart gives information about the number of international students who applied to study in a European university from 4 different countries between 2004 to 2008.
Looking from an overall perspective, the figure of China and Japan both showed a dramatic decline, while that of the USA and Russia recorded some negligible changes throughout the time frame.
As the chart portrays, China was the origin of most abroad candidates with precisely 300000 students in 2004, this figure dropped significantly in those last years, before reaching 150000.
Meanwhile, in 2004, approximately 140000 applicants came from America, which showed an initial rise till 2006, followed an unnoticeable upward and finally equal with China.
On the other hand, this European university received more than 5000 pupils from Japan in 2004. From that to 2007, Japan's number showed a jump by 2000-3000, however, its plunged its ratio to less than 4000 in the final years.
In addition, no remarkable variation was seen in the number of Russia owing to hovering around 2500 students.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-08-09 | yencmvbhp27@gmail.com | 73 | view |
| 2021-09-07 | beauty flowers | 78 | view |
| 2021-09-07 | beauty flowers | 49 | view |
| 2017-02-16 | mr.cuong95 | 79 | view |
- The chart below shows the different levels of post school qualifications in Australia and the proportion of men and women who held them in 1999 50
- The chart shows the proportion of renewable energy in total energy supply in 4 countries from 1997 to 2010
- The graph shows Internet usage in Taiwan by age group 56
- The graph below shows information on employment rates across 6 countries in 1995 and 2005 73
- The bar chart shows the highest qualification attained by sex for the working age population in Wales in 2001 2002 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, however, if, look, so, while, in addition, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 896.0 965.302439024 93% => OK
No of words: 169.0 196.424390244 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.30177514793 4.92477711251 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.60555127546 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69456307119 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 116.0 106.607317073 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.686390532544 0.547539520022 125% => OK
syllable_count: 261.0 283.868780488 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.0385281359 43.030603864 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.0 112.824112599 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.1428571429 22.9334400587 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.85714285714 5.23603664747 188% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 3.83414634146 156% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.362672027638 0.215688989381 168% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.160277531457 0.103423049105 155% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.169604105589 0.0843802449381 201% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.170341125236 0.15604864568 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.18181121404 0.0819641961636 222% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 13.2329268293 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 61.2550243902 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.76 11.4140731707 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.5 8.06136585366 118% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 40.7170731707 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 11.4329268293 131% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.