The chart shows the number of international students from four different countries applying for universities in a European country from the year 2004 to 2008
The chart gives information about the number of international students who applied to study in a European university from 4 different countries between 2004 to 2008.
Looking from an overall perspective, the figure of China and Japan both showed a dramatic decline, while that of the USA and Russia recorded some negligible changes throughout the time frame.
As the chart portrays, China was the origin of most abroad candidates with precisely 300000 students in 2004, this figure dropped significantly in those last years, before reaching 150000.
Meanwhile, in 2004, approximately 140000 applicants came from America, which rose initially till 2006, followed an unnoticeable upward and finally equaled with China.
On the other hand, this European university received more than 5000 pupils from Japan in 2004. From that to 2007, Japan's number showed a jump by 2000-3000. However, it plunged its ratio to less than 4000 in the last years of the research. In addition, no remarkable variation was seen in the number of Russia owing to hovering around 2500 students.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-08-09 | yencmvbhp27@gmail.com | 73 | view |
| 2021-09-07 | beauty flowers | 78 | view |
| 2021-09-07 | beauty flowers | 49 | view |
| 2017-02-16 | mr.cuong95 | 79 | view |
- The bar chart below shows a survey of a group of young professionals aged 20 30 years who were asked to state which factors motivated them to succeed 80
- The graphs below show the types of music albums purchased by people in Britain according to sex and age 78
- The bar chart below shows the percentage of government spending on roads and transport in 4 countries in the years 1990 1995 2000 2005 84
- The chart shows the number of international students from four different countries applying for universities in a European country from the year 2004 to 2008 49
- A survey conducted for the places in which people gain access to the Internet from 1998 to 2004 95
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, however, if, look, so, while, in addition, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 901.0 965.302439024 93% => OK
No of words: 170.0 196.424390244 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.3 4.92477711251 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.61087313685 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72906311161 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 117.0 106.607317073 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.688235294118 0.547539520022 126% => OK
syllable_count: 262.8 283.868780488 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.1129855133 43.030603864 112% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.625 112.824112599 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.25 22.9334400587 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.625 5.23603664747 165% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.383112350365 0.215688989381 178% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.151549392912 0.103423049105 147% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.164640010716 0.0843802449381 195% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.197400008828 0.15604864568 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.189230028536 0.0819641961636 231% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.2329268293 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 61.2550243902 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.46 11.4140731707 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.42 8.06136585366 117% => OK
difficult_words: 51.0 40.7170731707 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 11.4329268293 131% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.