The given bar chart illustrates the distribution of mobile phones and landlines among a group of hundred people in seven different countries(Canada, US, Germany, Denmark, UK, Sweden, Italy) . According to the given graph legend, mobile phones are represented by blue and land lines are depicted by red color.
Overall, it can be deciphered from the given graph that Denmark is the only country whose people make use of mobile phones and land lines the most as opposed to Canada where both electronic devices are least preferred.
Going forward, in countries like Canada, US and Denmark residents like to make use of land lines as their primary device as compared to mobile phones. There is almost a 20% increased preference in Canada and the US which is then followed by Denmark where the gap narrows down to almost around 5%.
Interestingly, the other four countries namely Germany, UK, Sweden and Italy exhibit an opposite trend where the civilians like to keep their mobile phones handy as their primary point of contact. Italy has the maximum gap of around 50% in terms of mobile phone preference while the least in Germany drilling down to around 10%.
- Some people work for the same organisation all their working life Others think that it is better to work for different organisations Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 87
- The graph below show the percentage of men and woman aged 60 64 who were employed in four countries in 1970 and 2000 Summaries the information by selecting and reporting the main features make comparisons where relevant 78
- The chart shows the number of mobile phones and landlines per 100 people in selected countries Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information given 73
- The line graph below shows changes in the amount of fast food eaten by teenagers from Australia for 1975 to 2000 78
- The charts below show the average percentages in typical meals of three types of nutrients all of which may be unhealthy if eaten too much 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 188, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
... US, Germany, Denmark, UK, Sweden, Italy . According to the given graph legend, mo...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, then, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 969.0 965.302439024 100% => OK
No of words: 194.0 196.424390244 99% => OK
Chars per words: 4.99484536082 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.73207559907 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56038705161 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 112.0 106.607317073 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.577319587629 0.547539520022 105% => OK
syllable_count: 311.4 283.868780488 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 22.4926829268 120% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 34.8747028369 43.030603864 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 138.428571429 112.824112599 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.7142857143 22.9334400587 121% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.85714285714 5.23603664747 55% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.170191707485 0.215688989381 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0848845767304 0.103423049105 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.05349825126 0.0843802449381 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.112392091624 0.15604864568 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0594417495308 0.0819641961636 73% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.9 13.2329268293 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.07 61.2550243902 72% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.3012195122 134% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.96 11.4140731707 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.8 8.06136585366 109% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 40.7170731707 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.9970731707 116% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.