The chart shows the number of mobile phones and landlines per 100 people in selected countries.
The given bar chart reveals the proportion of mobile phones and landlines owned in certain countries, including canada, Denmark and italy. On the whole, in most of the given european countries, mobile phones are more popular than landlines, while in north america, namely canada and the US, individuals prefer landlines.
To begin with, italy is the country that the ownership of mobile phones is the highest, being almost 90 per 100 people. However, italy is also where only around 43 landlines are held by every 100 individuals, which is less than half of the mobile phone ownership.
On the contrary, there are more than 60 landlines possessed among 100 people on average in canada, yet just above 35 mobile phones are owned by the same population. Apart from this, it is interesting to note that unlike the situation in the other given countries in Europe, landlines seem to be more appealing to Danish, though there is no considerable difference of the number of mobile phones and landlines bought by every 100 individuals (approximately 82 and 88 respectively).
By and large, citizens in north america, such as canada, possess more landlines than mobile phones, while the preferred communication device is different in italy and some other given european countries.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-15 | Sandhu param | 61 | view |
| 2019-11-04 | sou@M | 56 | view |
| 2019-08-09 | ravitejacts | 78 | view |
| 2019-04-30 | mohsenmortazavi | 11 | view |
| 2019-04-26 | vinusharma27 | 56 | view |
- Some people believe that unpaid community service should be a compulsory part of high school programmes (for example working for a charity, improving the neighbourhood or teaching sports to younger children). To what extent do you agree or disagree? 61
- The chart shows the number of mobile phones and landlines per 100 people in selected countries. 73
- The charts below show the main reasons for study among students of different age groups and the amount of support they received from employers. 61
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, so, while, apart from, such as, by and large, on the contrary, on the whole, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 7.0 186% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1072.0 965.302439024 111% => OK
No of words: 208.0 196.424390244 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.15384615385 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.79765784423 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73340880013 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 117.0 106.607317073 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.5625 0.547539520022 103% => OK
syllable_count: 348.3 283.868780488 123% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.45097560976 117% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 29.0 22.4926829268 129% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 60.1532057605 43.030603864 140% => OK
Chars per sentence: 153.142857143 112.824112599 136% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.7142857143 22.9334400587 130% => OK
Discourse Markers: 15.5714285714 5.23603664747 297% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.358368753162 0.215688989381 166% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.172992023329 0.103423049105 167% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0472956210222 0.0843802449381 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.20481295395 0.15604864568 131% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0592485163142 0.0819641961636 72% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.7 13.2329268293 134% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.58 61.2550243902 55% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.8 10.3012195122 153% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.18 11.4140731707 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.79 8.06136585366 109% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 40.7170731707 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.9970731707 124% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.