The charts below show the main reasons for study among students of different age groups and the amount of support they received from employers.
The given bar charts reveal information regarding the major purposes for which various aged individuals study and the amount of support, namely time off allowed and financial help that such students’ employers offer. On the whole, the older the employees, the more likely they study for their own interests. Apart from this, the middle-aged students are supported least by their companies.
To begin with, in terms of reasons for study, there are four-fifths of young workers who are under 26 years old studying for career purpose, yet only around 10% of this age group is motivated by personal interests. In fact, the proportion of students aged between 26 and 49 who study mainly for career development declines constantly by approximately 10% as the age of them increases by every decade. Apparently, nearly 40% of the 40 to 49 aged individuals study for their careers, which is equivalent to the proportion of people who study out of interest in the same group. Moreover, the largest proportion of workers studying stemming from interests, namely 70% is from the group aged over 49.
In addition, with reference to the amount of manager support, approximately two thirds is provided for the youngest group (under 26 years old). However, the 30 to 39 years old group receives the least amount of support, which is around half of that for the youngest group, although the amount is merely about 5% less than that for the group aged from 40 to 49.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-09 | happyhappy | 67 | view |
| 2019-12-22 | rahulsd | 67 | view |
| 2019-10-07 | lordwind | 73 | view |
| 2019-10-07 | lordwind | 67 | view |
| 2019-09-27 | noor salah | 73 | view |
- The chart shows the number of mobile phones and landlines per 100 people in selected countries. 73
- Some people believe that unpaid community service should be a compulsory part of high school programmes (for example working for a charity, improving the neighbourhood or teaching sports to younger children). To what extent do you agree or disagree? 61
- The charts below show the main reasons for study among students of different age groups and the amount of support they received from employers. 61
Transition Words or Phrases used:
apparently, however, if, moreover, regarding, so, third, apart from, in addition, in fact, on the whole, to begin with, with reference to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 3.15609756098 285% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 10.0 5.60731707317 178% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 43.0 33.7804878049 127% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1213.0 965.302439024 126% => OK
No of words: 245.0 196.424390244 125% => OK
Chars per words: 4.95102040816 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.95632099841 3.73543355544 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67136542854 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 132.0 106.607317073 124% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.538775510204 0.547539520022 98% => OK
syllable_count: 353.7 283.868780488 125% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 22.4926829268 120% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 51.2823219366 43.030603864 119% => OK
Chars per sentence: 134.777777778 112.824112599 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.2222222222 22.9334400587 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 15.2222222222 5.23603664747 291% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 3.70975609756 216% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.392612451574 0.215688989381 182% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.169760510015 0.103423049105 164% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0443816297423 0.0843802449381 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.265341266504 0.15604864568 170% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00945961254116 0.0819641961636 12% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 13.2329268293 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.99 61.2550243902 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.73 11.4140731707 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.52 8.06136585366 106% => OK
difficult_words: 55.0 40.7170731707 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.9970731707 116% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.