The map below shows the village of Stokeford in 1930 and 2010.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The given map includes two smaller maps which illustrate how Stokeford village changed during the period of time between 1930 and 2010.
Overall, while River Stoke and the main road in this locale remained the same, the farmland underwent a massive residential development.
In 1930, the village consisted mostly of farmland with just a few houses, a small primary school, two shops and a post office. To the east of the village there was a large house surrounded by gardens.
By 2010 the village had changed considerably due to an increase in local population and therefore, more housing was provided. Houses were added all along the main road, replacing the former shops; additional roads were constructed from the main road. The farmland once situated next to the river had completely disappeared, making way for more residences. The primary school was extended, and the large house was converted into a retirement home with its smaller gardens. To the north of the village the bridge built over the main road and River Stoke stayed unchanged.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 99, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...ow Stokeford village changed during the period of time between 1930 and 2010. Overall, while ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
therefore, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 21.0 33.7804878049 62% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 879.0 965.302439024 91% => OK
No of words: 173.0 196.424390244 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.08092485549 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.62669911048 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58026291118 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 108.0 106.607317073 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.624277456647 0.547539520022 114% => OK
syllable_count: 267.3 283.868780488 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 19.2988197682 43.030603864 45% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 97.6666666667 112.824112599 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.2222222222 22.9334400587 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.77777777778 5.23603664747 34% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.157718726959 0.215688989381 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0642636227674 0.103423049105 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0524914500534 0.0843802449381 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.100347608268 0.15604864568 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0608525268724 0.0819641961636 74% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.2329268293 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 61.2550243902 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.18 11.4140731707 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.41 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.