The charts below compare the age structure of the populations of France and India in 1984.
The bar graphs show the percentages of the population, in terms of age, in both genders of France and India in 1984.
Overall, while the age structures of female and male equalized in India, the proportions of women were higher than men at the same age in France. Besides, the population of India was younger than France in 1984.
In India, the group aged below 5 was the most popular resident (14%). When people grew older, the rates which they accounted for population tended to decrease, and the lowest point was nearly 2% in the group aged 65-70. Inhabitants aged over 70 occupied almost 3% of the age structure.
In France, citizens aged 40-45 had the same percentage as their counterparts in India (6%). While the rates of groups aged below 40 were lesser than these figures in India, the inhabitants aged 30-35 occupied the highest point (8%) and higher than the equivalent figure in India (7%). Besides, residents aged over 70 accounted for 10% in France population.
- The diagram below shows how solar panels can be used to provide electricity for domestic use. 84
- These days more fathers stay at home and take care of their children while mothers go out to work. What could be the reasons for this? Do you think it is a positive or a negative development? 61
- The table illustrates how much money donated to support technology, by the US, EU, and other countries charities, in billions of US dollars between 2006 and 2010. 78
- The media should include more stories which report good news. To whatextent do you agree or disagree? 73
- The graph below shows the average number of UK commuters travelling each day by day car, bus or train between 1970 and 2030. 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 213, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... India was younger than France in 1984. In India, the group aged below 5 was the...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 33.7804878049 80% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 802.0 965.302439024 83% => OK
No of words: 168.0 196.424390244 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.77380952381 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.60020574368 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.50056682916 2.65546596893 94% => OK
Unique words: 92.0 106.607317073 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.547619047619 0.547539520022 100% => OK
syllable_count: 243.0 283.868780488 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 42.9352081486 43.030603864 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.1111111111 112.824112599 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.6666666667 22.9334400587 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.55555555556 5.23603664747 30% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.376858555823 0.215688989381 175% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.171786984442 0.103423049105 166% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0682855698776 0.0843802449381 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.248108098755 0.15604864568 159% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0459670938389 0.0819641961636 56% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.4 13.2329268293 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 70.13 61.2550243902 114% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.3012195122 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.39 11.4140731707 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.91 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.