The charts below give information about the way in which water was used in different countries in 2000.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The pie chart illustrates the data about the way water is being consumed by different nations in the year 2000.
Overall, It can be seen that there are three categories of water consumption i.e Agriculture, Industry, and Domestic use. At the same time, the chart shows water usage data of four countries Canada, New Zealand, India, and China.
First of all, It can be seen that water used for agricultural purposes is almost one-third of the overall usage. Secondly, the Industrial sectors require 22% of H2O and last but not least, Domestic water usage stands out at 8%.
Looking at the mentioned countries, India and China both use water mainly for agricultural purposes and the comes New Zealand with 44% for farming followed by Canada 8%. At the same time, water used for domestic work is below 15% for all nations except New Zealand 46%. In the end, Canada is the largest user of water for industrial purposes and the rest below 25%.
- Some people believe that giving longer prison sentences is the best way to reduce crime Others believe that there are better ways to reduce crime Discuss both views and give your opinion 84
- The table below shows the results of surveys in 2000 2005 and 2010 about one university Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The graphs below show the types of music albums purchased by people in Britain according to sex and age Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information shown below 67
- With the improvements in today s health care society has to care for more and more elderly people Do you feel that society will be able to cope with the increase in numbers of elderly people today and how can it be managed Give reasons for your answer and 67
- IELTS Writing Task 1 Example 9You should spend about 20 minutes on this task The chart shows British Emigration to selected destinations between 2004 and 2007 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons wh
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, look, second, secondly, third, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 20.0 33.7804878049 59% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 785.0 965.302439024 81% => OK
No of words: 163.0 196.424390244 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.81595092025 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.57311423478 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.41820538096 2.65546596893 91% => OK
Unique words: 96.0 106.607317073 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.588957055215 0.547539520022 108% => OK
syllable_count: 239.4 283.868780488 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 21.4767315949 43.030603864 50% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 98.125 112.824112599 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.375 22.9334400587 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.375 5.23603664747 141% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 3.70975609756 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.158345469572 0.215688989381 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0801002039225 0.103423049105 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0494351826143 0.0843802449381 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.115085054971 0.15604864568 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0542545215795 0.0819641961636 66% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 13.2329268293 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 61.2550243902 97% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.68 11.4140731707 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.41 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.