The charts below give information about the way in which water was used in different countries in 2000.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The given charts illustrate the usage of water in China, India, New Zealand and Canada in 2000.
Overall, it can be obviously seen that the largest proportion of water usage in the world was spent on agriculture. Furthermore, India and China were the two countries which utilised water for agriculture the most. It is also apparent that water used for domestic was the smallest proportion. Finally, New Zealand was the country which took advantage of water for domestic the most, while in Canada was noticeable for industry.
Turning to the first diagram, agriculture water usage took into account 70% and ranked in the first position of the world water use in 2000. According to the second chart, India used water for that figure the most with a percentage of 92% which was the highest out of the total percentage in this country. It was also the case for China with 62% which placed this country in the second position. Meanwhile, only 8% of water was used for agriculture in Canada which was less than India nearly 12 times.
It can be observed through the second chart that the main purpose of using water in New Zealand in 2000 was for the country’s domestic (46%), and it shows that this country contributes the highest proportion to 8% domestic of world water use. It is remarkable that Canada used 80% of water for industrial development which was higher than nearly 30 times in India with only 3% industrial water use.
- Some people consider price as most important thing to consider when buying a product or service Do you agree or disagree 73
- In the future all cars buses and trucks will be driverless The only people travelling inside these vehicles will be passengers Do you think the advantages of driverless vehicles outweigh the disadvantages 67
- The charts below give information about the way in which water was used in different countries in 2000 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- The diagram below shows the life cycle of the salmon Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The diagram below shows the process of recycling plastic bottles Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, furthermore, second, so, while, as for
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 7.0 214% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 12.0 3.15609756098 380% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 15.0 5.60731707317 268% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1191.0 965.302439024 123% => OK
No of words: 248.0 196.424390244 126% => OK
Chars per words: 4.80241935484 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.96837696647 3.73543355544 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.47160974036 2.65546596893 93% => OK
Unique words: 111.0 106.607317073 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.447580645161 0.547539520022 82% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 361.8 283.868780488 127% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 1.53170731707 326% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.7281965906 43.030603864 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.272727273 112.824112599 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5454545455 22.9334400587 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.90909090909 5.23603664747 113% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.09268292683 220% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.233081318669 0.215688989381 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.116771001312 0.103423049105 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0351747752832 0.0843802449381 42% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.168935269904 0.15604864568 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0454490291299 0.0819641961636 55% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.2329268293 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 61.2550243902 94% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.86 11.4140731707 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.78 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 40.7170731707 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, furthermore, second, so, while, as for
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 7.0 214% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 12.0 3.15609756098 380% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 15.0 5.60731707317 268% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1191.0 965.302439024 123% => OK
No of words: 248.0 196.424390244 126% => OK
Chars per words: 4.80241935484 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.96837696647 3.73543355544 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.47160974036 2.65546596893 93% => OK
Unique words: 111.0 106.607317073 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.447580645161 0.547539520022 82% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 361.8 283.868780488 127% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 1.53170731707 326% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.7281965906 43.030603864 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.272727273 112.824112599 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5454545455 22.9334400587 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.90909090909 5.23603664747 113% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.09268292683 220% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.233081318669 0.215688989381 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.116771001312 0.103423049105 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0351747752832 0.0843802449381 42% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.168935269904 0.15604864568 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0454490291299 0.0819641961636 55% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.2329268293 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 61.2550243902 94% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.86 11.4140731707 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.78 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 40.7170731707 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.