The charts below give information on the ages of the populations of Yemen and Italy In 2000 and projections for 2050.  Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

Essay topics:

The charts below give information on the ages of the populations of Yemen and Italy In 2000 and projections for 2050.

  Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The given pie charts shows data on the population ages in Yemen and Italy in the year 2000 and also projected these portions of population for the year 2050.

  According to the given data, more than half of the population of Yemen was below 14 years old in the year 2000. In this same year their population from 15 to 59 years old was just over 46% and only about 3% of their population was over 60 years old. In this year there were one-fourth population in Italy over 60 years old and more than 60% of their population was from 15 to 59 years old. The percentage of aged people in Italy was much higher than Yemen in 2000. Finally the percentage of population up to 14 years in Italy was less than 15% in this year was.

  The pie charts also gives the projection of the percentage of population based on age group for the year 2050 and according to this projection the percentage of younger people in Yemen would decrease while the number of ag d people over 60 years would increase only by 2%. On the contrary, the aged people in Italy in 2050 would be more than 40% while they would have less young people.

Votes
Average: 6.7 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2019-11-16 kimmy3 67 view
Essays by user kimmy3 :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s of population for the year 2050.   According to the given data, more than h...
^^
Line 5, column 468, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Finally,
...aly was much higher than Yemen in 2000. Finally the percentage of population up to 14 y...
^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...as less than 15% in this year was.   The pie charts also gives the projection...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, so, while, on the contrary

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 1.00243902439 399% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 42.0 33.7804878049 124% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 3.97073170732 277% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 927.0 965.302439024 96% => OK
No of words: 210.0 196.424390244 107% => OK
Chars per words: 4.41428571429 4.92477711251 90% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.80675409584 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.34452611866 2.65546596893 88% => OK
Unique words: 87.0 106.607317073 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.414285714286 0.547539520022 76% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 270.0 283.868780488 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.9686068058 43.030603864 135% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.875 112.824112599 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.25 22.9334400587 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.125 5.23603664747 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.180555023875 0.215688989381 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.115908342637 0.103423049105 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0758263361892 0.0843802449381 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.178849554374 0.15604864568 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0748660141399 0.0819641961636 91% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.2329268293 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 70.47 61.2550243902 115% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.59 11.4140731707 75% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.58 8.06136585366 82% => OK
difficult_words: 22.0 40.7170731707 54% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.