The charts below give information on the ages of the populations of Yemen and Italy in 2000 and projections for 2050.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
The rendered pie chart displays the comparison of data on population percentage of different age groups in Yemen and Italy in 2000 and predictions for 2050.
Overall, a cursory glance id enough to make it clear that age group of 15-59 years makes most of the populace in both the countries in the given time span.
Turning to the details, it can be analyzed that in Yemen, during 2000, half of the population consisted of citizens who fell under the age group of 0-14 years. But in future, the figures for this class are estimated to show a considerable plunge recording for 37%. The proportion noted for teenagers and middle-aged subjects was 46.3% and it is predicted that the figures will increase by 10% approximately. The least percentage reported was that of senior citizens, 3.6% which will exhibit a slight rise of 2%.
Proceeding towards to the remaining data, it is quite evident that in Italy, the population of people under the age group of 15-59 years is dominating in past and will remain like that in future as per the projections despite the predicted plunge from 61.6% to 46.2% in 2050. A dramatic escalation in the figures for 60+ years age group is expected in further future, recording for 42.3%. As for the 0-14 years class, it is estimated to decrease by 3% in the upcoming year, 2050.
- Governments should spend money on railways rather than roads To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 92
- Nowadays in many countries young people leave rural areas to study or work in cities Is it a positive or negative development 89
- The charts below show the percentage of water used for different purposes in six areas of the world Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The charts below show the proportion of holidaymakers using four different types of accommodations in three different years Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 55
- Some experts believe that unpaid community service should be compulsory part of high school programs To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 165, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
... under the age group of 0-14 years. But in future, the figures for this class are estimat...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 192, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...4 years. But in future, the figures for this class are estimated to show a considera...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, so, as for
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 1.00243902439 399% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 3.15609756098 253% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 12.0 5.60731707317 214% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 40.0 33.7804878049 118% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1088.0 965.302439024 113% => OK
No of words: 229.0 196.424390244 117% => OK
Chars per words: 4.75109170306 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.89008302616 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61354350212 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 127.0 106.607317073 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.554585152838 0.547539520022 101% => OK
syllable_count: 324.0 283.868780488 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.5737577124 43.030603864 122% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.888888889 112.824112599 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.4444444444 22.9334400587 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.11111111111 5.23603664747 40% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.219961765045 0.215688989381 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0941442914964 0.103423049105 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0720645074433 0.0843802449381 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.151404816646 0.15604864568 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0830485802103 0.0819641961636 101% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.2329268293 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 63.02 61.2550243902 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.57 11.4140731707 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.39 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 51.0 40.7170731707 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 165, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
... under the age group of 0-14 years. But in future, the figures for this class are estimat...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 192, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...4 years. But in future, the figures for this class are estimated to show a considera...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, so, as for
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 1.00243902439 399% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 3.15609756098 253% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 12.0 5.60731707317 214% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 40.0 33.7804878049 118% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1088.0 965.302439024 113% => OK
No of words: 229.0 196.424390244 117% => OK
Chars per words: 4.75109170306 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.89008302616 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61354350212 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 127.0 106.607317073 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.554585152838 0.547539520022 101% => OK
syllable_count: 324.0 283.868780488 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.5737577124 43.030603864 122% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.888888889 112.824112599 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.4444444444 22.9334400587 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.11111111111 5.23603664747 40% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.219961765045 0.215688989381 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0941442914964 0.103423049105 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0720645074433 0.0843802449381 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.151404816646 0.15604864568 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0830485802103 0.0819641961636 101% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.2329268293 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 63.02 61.2550243902 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.57 11.4140731707 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.39 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 51.0 40.7170731707 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.