The charts below give Information on the ages of the populations of Yemen and Italy In 2000 and projections for 2050.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The mentioned pie charts illustrate the data of the population of Yemen and Italy according to the age group in 2000 and prediction after fifty years.
Overall, as is represented by the pie charts, in the beginning of the year children were dominant in Yemen, while middle age group accounted the highest proportion in Italy. However, in future it is forecasted that middle age people are going to have the largest population in both Italy and Yemen.
It is evident that during 2000 children’s accounted more than half of total population (60.1%), but it is going to be decreased by approximately 24% in 2050. Likewise, age range of 15-59 years and 60+ years had figure of 46.3% and 3.6 respectively in 2000, whereas it have been already claimed the former will rise spectacularly and will reach 57.3% , while the latter will have mere increase of only around 3% by 2050 in Yemen.
However, in Italy, population of 15-59 had significantly large ratio (61.6%) , but it will encounter the sharp decrease of 15% , although decrement will be observed , but it will remain dominant in future also. In contrast, children had ratio of only 14.3%, which will gradually diminish and reach 11.5%. In addition, 60+ people had percentage of nearly a quarter of total population, while it is projected that it will witness the considerable growth and will obtain ratio of 42.3%.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 272, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'has'?
Suggestion: has
...nd 3.6 respectively in 2000, whereas it have been already claimed the former will ri...
^^^^
Line 5, column 353, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
... rise spectacularly and will reach 57.3% , while the latter will have mere increas...
^^
Line 7, column 75, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...5-59 had significantly large ratio 61.6% , but it will encounter the sharp decreas...
^^
Line 7, column 125, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...will encounter the sharp decrease of 15% , although decrement will be observed , b...
^^
Line 7, column 163, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...5% , although decrement will be observed , but it will remain dominant in future a...
^^
Line 7, column 204, Rule ID: ALSO_SENT_END[1]
Message: 'Also' is not used at the end of the sentence. Use 'as well' instead.
Suggestion: as well
..., but it will remain dominant in future also. In contrast, children had ratio of onl...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, likewise, so, whereas, while, in addition, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 1.00243902439 898% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 11.0 6.8 162% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 11.0 5.60731707317 196% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 3.97073170732 227% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1150.0 965.302439024 119% => OK
No of words: 230.0 196.424390244 117% => OK
Chars per words: 5.0 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.89432290496 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74964053063 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 126.0 106.607317073 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.547826086957 0.547539520022 100% => OK
syllable_count: 341.1 283.868780488 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.07073170732 467% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 28.0 22.4926829268 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 50.0749438342 43.030603864 116% => OK
Chars per sentence: 143.75 112.824112599 127% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.75 22.9334400587 125% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.75 5.23603664747 186% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 1.69756097561 353% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.131311525134 0.215688989381 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0688032538998 0.103423049105 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0577359711496 0.0843802449381 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.103676811243 0.15604864568 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0577338637923 0.0819641961636 70% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.5 13.2329268293 125% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.52 61.2550243902 84% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 10.3012195122 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.31 11.4140731707 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.66 8.06136585366 107% => OK
difficult_words: 53.0 40.7170731707 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.9970731707 120% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.