The charts below give Information on the ages of the populations of Yemen and Italy In 2000 and projections for 2050.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The charts illustrate the proportions of the maturity of citizens who live in Yemen and Italy in 2000 and the prediction of the populations in 2050.

Overall, the charts are divided into three groups: the under 14-year-old, people from 15-59 years and the elders who are over 60 years old. The individuals who are middle-aged (from 15 to 59 years old) initially account for the majority through the years in both countries.

Not only Yemen but also Italy, the tendency of the new generation will have decreased, especially Yemen (50.1% to 37% and Italy: 14.3% to 11.5%) for the period of 50 years from 2000. In return, the two remaining groups take the larger percentages of the four charts.

From the beginning in 2000, the labor division in Italy is 10.3% higher than Yemen which is 46.3%, followed by the elders' group which is 24.1% compared to Yemen's 3.6%. But the young in Yemen is on the opposite to the others ( 50.1% to 14.3% in 2000 and 37% to 11.5% by 2050).

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)
Essay Categories
IELTS Writing Task I - IELTS Academic
Essays by the user:
>>> more essays by the user >>>

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...arger percentages of the four charts. From the beginning in 2000, the labor di...
^^^
Line 7, column 185, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ompared to Yemens 3.6%. But the young in Yemen is on the opposite to the others ...
^^
Line 7, column 225, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... Yemen is on the opposite to the others 50.1% to 14.3% in 2000 and 37% to 11.5%...
^^
Line 7, column 253, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...o the others 50.1% to 14.3% in 2000 and 37% to 11.5% by 2050.
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, so

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 0.0 5.60731707317 0% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 799.0 965.302439024 83% => OK
No of words: 172.0 196.424390244 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.64534883721 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.62144681703 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.41845790029 2.65546596893 91% => OK
Unique words: 96.0 106.607317073 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.558139534884 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 217.8 283.868780488 77% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.9924283051 43.030603864 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.142857143 112.824112599 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.5714285714 22.9334400587 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.85714285714 5.23603664747 35% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 3.70975609756 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.156245100601 0.215688989381 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0809891661699 0.103423049105 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0640738614316 0.0843802449381 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.113392023114 0.15604864568 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0651108994971 0.0819641961636 79% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.2329268293 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 72.5 61.2550243902 118% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.99 11.4140731707 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.13 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.