Up to now, our environment has been contaminated to the peak which is a huge warning. It is believed that individuals contribute almost no effect to improve the environment no matter how much they will try, but international groups or authorities can. This essay will debate the idea and show the importance of particular parts which show my disagreement with the statement.
First of all, the residents are surprisingly the main problem for our surroundings. The combination of water, air, and soil pollutions are significantly produced by the inhabitants such as household garbage or personal vehicals exhaust fume. According to recent surveys, the world garbage dumps have increased sharply in a few years due to the consumption of the rising population in the world. Therefore, the sum of the input of every person will cause a great impact on the environment.
Every single organization is not able to be organized without the individuals which are irreplaceable. Therefore, it is undeniable to say that the efforts that the companies or the governments make are up to their employees which leads to the false of the statement. For instance, an area including the initiated residents will be much easier and more effective for the authority to launch programs to improve nature.
In conclusion, individuals not only play a vital role in bettering the environment but also the compulsory part of groups or governments to take the same action.
- Some people believe that unpaid community service be a compulsory part of high school programs (for example working for a charity, improving the neighborhood or teaching sports to younger children)To what extent do you agree or disagree? 73
- The graph shows Underground Station Passenger Numbers in London. 78
- There are many different types of music in the world today. Why do we need music? Is the traditional music of a country more important than the International music that is heard everywhere nowadays? 70
- Research shows that business meetings, discussions and training are happening online nowadays. Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages? 56
- The Graph below shows average carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions per person in the United Kindom, Sweden, Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, so, therefore, for instance, in conclusion, such as, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 11.0 24.0651302605 46% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 41.998997996 71% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1220.0 1615.20841683 76% => OK
No of words: 236.0 315.596192385 75% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.16949152542 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.91947592106 4.20363070211 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.1263491773 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 144.0 176.041082164 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.610169491525 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 385.2 506.74238477 76% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.1051989817 49.4020404114 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.909090909 106.682146367 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.4545454545 20.7667163134 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.90909090909 7.06120827912 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.104876085928 0.244688304435 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0336802122521 0.084324248473 40% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0389571632536 0.0667982634062 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0607142272061 0.151304729494 40% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0281503635955 0.056905535591 49% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.0946893788 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.71 12.4159519038 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.96 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 78.4519038076 82% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.