The charts below give information on the ages of the populations of Yemen and Italy in 2000 and projections for 2050.
Depicted by the charts is the information about how many people in three different age categories live in Yemen and Italy from 2000 to 2050.
Overall, it is apperant that in 2000 people living both in Italy and Yemen were dominated by people aged15-59 years old. Additionally, it is predicted that this age still is likely to show its superiority over the other categories.
During the period, the figure for people in Yemen aged 0-14 years old and up to 60 years old was predicted to increase. While the former stood at 46.3% (2000), and then it is projected to increase dramatically by 11% (2050), the letter accounted for 3.6% in 2000, and its number is likely to have a slight rise to 5.7%. By contrast, 60+ years category took a half proportion in 2000, it is projected to drop to 37% a half century later.
In Italy, the age population seems different. The level of people aged 15-59 years, 60+ years, and 0-14 years old stood at over three-fifths, less than a quarter, and less than a fifth severally. While the age of 15-59 and 0-14 years old number is projected to decline, dropping to 46.2% and 11.5% each, the figure for up to 60 years old is predictedto have dramatic rise, soaring to 42.3% by 2050.
- The charts below give information on the ages of the populations of Yemen and Italy in 2000 and projections for 2050. 73
- The chart below shows the percentage change in the share of international students among university graduates in different Canadian provinces between 2001 and 2006. 84
- The diagram below shows the number of landline ownership telephones per 1000 people in different countries over a five-year period. 78
- Some people think that they have right to use as much fresh water as they want. Others think government should tightly control the use of fresh water as it is limited source. Discuss both views and give your opinion. 84
- The chart below shows the expenditure of two countries on consumer goods in 2010. 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 142, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e in Yemen and Italy from 2000 to 2050. Overall, it is apperant that in 2000 peo...
^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 152, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ncrease. While the former stood at 46.3% 2000, and then it is projected to increa...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so, still, then, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1008.0 965.302439024 104% => OK
No of words: 218.0 196.424390244 111% => OK
Chars per words: 4.62385321101 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.84250218741 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.51813137212 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Unique words: 111.0 106.607317073 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.509174311927 0.547539520022 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 287.1 283.868780488 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.482926829268 828% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.6741287299 43.030603864 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.0 112.824112599 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.2222222222 22.9334400587 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.88888888889 5.23603664747 55% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.288992599398 0.215688989381 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.128043760524 0.103423049105 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0840982614291 0.0843802449381 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.197249668873 0.15604864568 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0835545887498 0.0819641961636 102% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.2329268293 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 72.5 61.2550243902 118% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.81 11.4140731707 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.58 8.06136585366 94% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.