The charts below show the average percentages in typical meals of three types of nutrients all of which may be unhealthy if eaten too much Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant

Essay topics:

The charts below show the average percentages in typical meals of three types of nutrients, all of which may be unhealthy if eaten too much.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The pie charts compare three kinds of nutritions which people intake excessive in daily life will damage health in the USA.

It is noticeable that the proportion of sodium and saturated fat in dinner and lunch are the biggest. However, the percentage of sugar in the snacks is the largest one, three kinds of nutrient substance in breakfast are the less.

In the three pie charts, the percentage of sodium and saturated fat in dinner are the most, respectively are 43 % and 37% but the percentage in adding sugar is the second most, account for 23%. In the same way, there are two types of nutritions are the second most in lunch, respectively are sodium and saturated and the percentage are 29 and 26. By contrast, adding sugar in lunch is the third largest, only occupy on 19%.

The snacks are the biggest proportion in adding sugar, there are 42%. However, three kinds of nutritions in the breakfast are the less, respectively are 14%, 16% and 16%. Also, sodium in snacks and breakfast are in the same proportion, only 14%. And the saturated fat and sugar are the equal percentage in breakfast, make up 16%.

Votes
Average: 6.1 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2024-03-28 minhnhat2002 11 view
2024-03-28 minhnhat2002 78 view
2024-01-04 Ahmad_off 78 view
2023-11-10 Mayuresh0809 61 view
2023-10-10 MinyiChu 61 view
Essays by user MinyiChu :

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, second, so, third, in the same way

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 7.0 257% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 6.8 176% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 33.7804878049 77% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 924.0 965.302439024 96% => OK
No of words: 195.0 196.424390244 99% => OK
Chars per words: 4.73846153846 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.73687570622 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.55391672317 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 85.0 106.607317073 80% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.435897435897 0.547539520022 80% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 279.0 283.868780488 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.6212705793 43.030603864 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.4 112.824112599 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5 22.9334400587 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.8 5.23603664747 111% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0898899569044 0.215688989381 42% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0382589563216 0.103423049105 37% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0347138611734 0.0843802449381 41% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0623732138464 0.15604864568 40% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0130671369564 0.0819641961636 16% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.6 13.2329268293 80% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 61.2550243902 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.21 11.4140731707 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.6 8.06136585366 82% => OK
difficult_words: 25.0 40.7170731707 61% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.