The charts below show the changes in ownership of electrical appliances and amount of time spent doing housework in households in one country between 1920 and 2019.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The line graph illustrates the percentage of homes owning electrical appliances between 1920 and 2019 and compares it to the housework performed per week
during the same duration.
The usage of appliances increasing the hours spent doing household chores had decreased. The usage of all three household devices had shown steady increases from 1920 to 2019. Washing machines were used by 40% in 1920, which again rose to 70% in 1960 with a slight dip in 1980, after which it rose gradually to reach its peak of around 75% in 2019. Refrigerators and vacuum cleaners in 1920 were used by around 30% and 5% respectively. Moreover, both of these items showed a constant rise, and peaked to 100% by 2019 . Refrigerators peaked in 1980 and
vacuum cleaners in 2000. Both retained 100% thereafter each of those years.
In contrast, the chores done in houses show progress declining. Around 50 hours of work per week was put into household chores, this dropped to around 15 hours per week, coinciding with the increased use of appliances. It thereafter plateaued and reached the lowest which was around 10% in 2000.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 89, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...t doing household chores had decreased. The usage of all three household devices ha...
^^^
Line 3, column 516, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...onstant rise, and peaked to 100% by 2019 . Refrigerators peaked in 1980 and vacuu...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
moreover, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 39.0 33.7804878049 115% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 924.0 965.302439024 96% => OK
No of words: 187.0 196.424390244 95% => OK
Chars per words: 4.94117647059 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.69794460899 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65070862686 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 113.0 106.607317073 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.604278074866 0.547539520022 110% => OK
syllable_count: 252.9 283.868780488 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 44.2787936856 43.030603864 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 84.0 112.824112599 74% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.0 22.9334400587 74% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.90909090909 5.23603664747 36% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.142902434791 0.215688989381 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0541756954254 0.103423049105 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0539057381328 0.0843802449381 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0667622763724 0.15604864568 43% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0724481825883 0.0819641961636 88% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.3 13.2329268293 78% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 71.14 61.2550243902 116% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.3012195122 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.08 11.4140731707 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.19 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 40.7170731707 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.