The charts below show the changes in ownership of electrical appliances and amount of time spent doing housework in one country.
The diagrams give information about the proportion of households possessing several types of electrical devices and the weekly hours spent on doing chores of each household in a nation from 1920 to 2019. Overall, people tended to own more devices and the time which was taken to do housework showed an obvious decrease.
Regarding the first charts, the area of refrigerator witnessed a significant rise, from just around 0% in 1920 to just under 100% in 1980 and remained stable until 2019. Similarly, that of vacuum cleaner also increased from roughly 30% to approximately 100% in 2000 and leveled off since then. Washing machine also saw a development in figures, however, it was marginal when this sector dropped from the first place in 1920 to the last one in 2019, amounted to roughly 75% in number.
Looking at the second chart, households needed to use 50 hours for chores on a weekly basis, however, the data had a downward trend in the following years and reached nearly 10 hours in 2019.
- In some countries owning a home rather than renting one is very important for people Why might this be the case Do you think this is a positive or negative situation 67
- Many manufactured food and drink products contain high levels of sugar which causes many health problems Sugary products should be made more expensive to encourage people to consume less sugar Do you agree or disagree Do you agree or disagree 73
- Nowadays young people spend too much of their free time in shopping malls Some people fear that this may have negative effects on young people and the society they live in To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
- The chart shows the percentage of women and men in one Asian country who passed when they took their driving test between 1980 and 2010 78
- The diagram below shows the process of making soft cheese Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, if, look, regarding, second, similarly, so, then
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 831.0 965.302439024 86% => OK
No of words: 171.0 196.424390244 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.85964912281 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.61617157096 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57829088195 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 112.0 106.607317073 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.654970760234 0.547539520022 120% => OK
syllable_count: 242.1 283.868780488 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 22.4926829268 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 34.0978982735 43.030603864 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 138.5 112.824112599 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.5 22.9334400587 124% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.6666666667 5.23603664747 223% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.122036774547 0.215688989381 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0552747856107 0.103423049105 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0552317087335 0.0843802449381 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0760433547249 0.15604864568 49% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.066183584892 0.0819641961636 81% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.7 13.2329268293 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.98 61.2550243902 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.8 10.3012195122 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.2 11.4140731707 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.09 8.06136585366 113% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 40.7170731707 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.9970731707 120% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.